|
From: Joey M. <jo...@sw...> - 2006-10-01 19:37:35
|
On Oct 1, 2006, at 3:15 AM, Joe English wrote: > The exceptions: by popular demand, [ttk::paned] will be > renamed [ttk::panedwindow]; and as long as we're doing > that [ttk::progressbar] will become [ttk::progress] too. Was ttk::progress really popularly demanded? IMHO, ttk::progressbar is a better name for the same reasons I think panedwindow is a better name. You could have a progress bar or a progress dialog, like Qt does. ttk::progress seems more ambiguous. Paned could mean windows or widgets, explicitly defining panedwindow I think is better. > Is there anything else anyone thinks should be done for 0.7.8? I never saw a response to the ttk::toplevel question? Is that going to be standard? I saw a bug report on sourceforge, but no real resolution and it only mentioned Aqua. In addition to Aqua, on Solaris, mixing a toplevel and tile widgets look awful. Thanks, Joey |