|
From: Will D. <wi...@wj...> - 2005-08-13 17:13:30
|
Damon,
Were you trying to write something that passed the Snit test suite,
or just an analogous framework? If the former, is not 100% because
of lack of time, or were there specific things you found you couldn't
duplicate? The subject of re-implementing Snit on top of XOTcl or
something like it has indeed come up recently, and it's an interesting
notion; I'm very curious to know what the gaps might be.
Will
On Aug 12, 2005, at 10:45 AM, Jeff Hobbs wrote:
> Damon Courtney wrote:
>
>>> Given the complexity of the rest ... I'm inclined to think that this
>>> may well be more appropriate as a snidget (or xidget, should we do
>>> xotcl widgets ;) ). At some point, we have to draw the line for
>>> where
>>> we layer and where we hard-code.
>>>
>>
>> I had heard somewhere that 8.5 would include XOTcl as the
>> object system with wrappers for Itcl and Snit? Is that true?
>> I piddled around with a library a while back that was
>> basically SNIT written in XOTcl. I called it XWidgets. 0-]
>> It wasn't 100% there, but pretty damn close. If anyone's
>> interested, I can send it along somewhere.
>>
>
> I'm interested.
>
> Jeff
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
will -at- wjduquette.com | Catch our weblog,
http://foothills.wjduquette.com | The View from the Foothills
|