From: <mi...@bg...> - 2005-02-28 13:17:52
|
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:44:47 -1000 Greg Lee <gr...@li...> wrote: > mikus wrote: > >> Just imagine -- it may be the case that all these years > >> Timidity has been "too slow" in applying GUS patch specified > >> modulation envelope rate changes. > > Now I recall that Tuukka T. offers an option of running > the envelopes at double speed, which, he says, saves > some computation time and makes TiMidity "sound more > like a GUS". So I guess he knew there was an issue > here. I'm still trying to figure out the code. But this particular "feature" is implemented in a (IMHO) simplistic, brute-force fashion: if the double speed option is set, the value for "amount of volume_change per time unit" is doubled !! mikus |