From: mose <mo...@ti...> - 2007-11-26 00:44:32
|
le Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:26:11PM -0500 par Christian Fowler : > > FYI, There is no way to do virtual modules in SVN (one module being > comprised of other modules), at least as of my last investigation about a > year ago. For tiki, it's probably not that big of a deal, since only a few > libs like _adodb are combined into the main virtual module. Bitweaver is > completely dependent on this, so svn wasn't an option for us. > > If you guys figure this out, we would love to hear about it... - yes, maybe we can find a way, but if we don't, we'll just make a common trunk and will use mods for used modules that can't be in (maybe lightbox, but I think all other optional modules are not used anymore, everybody forgot about them). > As an aside, perhaps I am getting cranky in my old age, however the > blessed simplicity of CVS has strong advantages, perhaps strong enough to > outweigh changesets/transactions. Overlaying CVS directories from multiple > CVS repositories (or into raw folders) is another extremely convenient > niceity that .svn just doesn't handle well. - well, that's not a very common need. About the easiness of use of cvs, I would say it's a question of habits. SVN is definately more flexible and reliable than CVS, and it's not adding complexity imho, just a different set of habits. cheers, mose > > - spider > > [ \ / Christian Fowler | spider AT viovio.com > [ >X< http://www.viovio.com/spider | http://www.bitweaver.org/spider > [ / \ ~~~ always plan in the millions ~~~ > |