|
From: Tim H. <hof...@hi...> - 2012-03-27 18:07:08
|
> > I'm thinking of replacing the somewhat cryptic special chars in the > command > > definitions: > I don't think they are cryptic at all. > > Except % and @, but those are for Texmaker compatibility... > > The letters are just abbreviations for Absolute path (I always wanted to > add Relative path, perhaps relative to the master file), Middle part and > Extension. Oh, m stands for middle part. That should be written in the explanation. Currently there is only filename and basefile mentioned. And we have four types of terminators, and the %%, @@, ?? escape sequences and the c prefix. I don't think this is very intuitive. > If you write them out, you have to type more and could just introduce > typing errors. IMHO typing more is a non-issue, because you seldom change the settings. Typing errors could be easily checked after each change to a command. On the other hand I consider the improved readability a great plus. You don't have to read any documentation to understand "[filename].[extension]". I doubt that this would work for the token ?me) I will put it on the idea torrent for further discussion. Tim |