From: Stuart A. Y. <sy...@gm...> - 2009-05-02 05:47:49
|
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Christian-Emil Ore <c.e...@il...> wrote: > Dear all > On the basis of the analysis of TEI/CRM in our DH2008 paper,Øyvind and I > suggest the following amendments to be posted on Sourgeforge. The numbers in > the parenthesis refer to the draft of the paper (attached). I've now thought about this some move and I think it's great. I have a small caveat though. My caveat is that this is an attempt to harmonise TEI with CIDOC-CRM/FRBRoo, starting with the CIDOC-CRM portion. I imagine that in due course people will want to harmonise the bibliographic TEI elements with FRBRoo, and I would not want them unnecessarily encumbered by the current effort in so far as <person>, <org>, <place> etc appear in <bibl>s. This maybe because I don't really understand CIDOC-CRM/FRBRoo. Maybe existing normalisation of <person>, <org> and <place> won't present a problem to the normalisation of <bibl>s containing them. cheers stuart |