From: E. <oyv...@mu...> - 2005-08-01 13:35:44
|
Dear all, Please find enclosed a draft for minutes from the SIG meeting in Victoria i June. Comments are welcome, including corrections from the people present at the meating. Notes from the second SIG meeting The meeting was held during the ACH/ALLC conference in Victoria, Canada, on June 15, 2005. Six persons were participating. Introduction In the minutes from the lest meeting, two groups of tasks were set up: 1. Tasks the conveners promised to do in 2004 and 2005 2. Tasks we agreed should be done, but with no appointed person responsible The tasks in group 1 are all on-going or finished, while of the tasks in group 2, only the identification of elements in TEI with "ontological relevance" (more on this expression below) is started. Motivation As a motivation for his interest in this work, Øyvind Eide described a project in which an analysis of relationships between person name elements in a TEI document was modeled in CIDOC-CRM. This work was discussed by the group, together with some aspects of the CIDOC-CRM model. The group agreed on the general idea that there are things, such as relationships between persons, that should be modeled outside TEI, but with a possibility for links to TEI documents. Identification of TEI element This item was presented to the group as "Identifying TEI elements of special ontological interest". This initiated a discussion, because the group rejected the wording. Several other phrases were suggested to replace "special ontological interest", among them "extra-textual (ontological) interest" and "references to the physical world". None of these truly covers what we want to express, though. Nevertheless, there were an common general understanding about what kind of elements we were talking about: Elements such as names, date and performances of plays, while elements such as italics, stanza and paragraphs are outside the scope of this SIG. Time did not permit any actual investigation into which elements in TEI are of interest. The on-going work in the FRBR/CIDOC-CRM Harmonization Group was discussed. It was argued that the TEI community should be involved in this work. 2005-08-01 Øyvind Eide -- Kind regards, Øyvind Eide |