We need to clarify for both locus and biblScope whether @from can be used independently of @to (as with, e.g. <span>), and if so what it means (from here to end, or this point only?)
Sorry for putting my 2p here but you don't seriously think @n is an option. If you want to keep some kind of coherence ("interop"?) with analogous construct (cf. your second example), you should just rely on @from-@to. Or have I missed something.... ?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Added <remark>s to explain usage when
a) only one page or unit is cited. = use @from, @to with identical value
b) only start page is cited. = use @from alone.
to the following elements: <locus>, <biblScope>, <citedRange>
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Assigning to martindholmes and setting as AMBER as will need further discussion.
Noting that before working on this, I need to check what Lou has done on ticket <http://purl.org/tei/FR/3518932>, which I think may overlap.
Breakout group thinks that for encoding "p. 3", we are happy with either:
<biblScope from="3" to="3">3</biblScope><biblScope n="3">3</biblScope>and want Council to say which they prefer.
For encoding "p. 3ff", you should do
<biblScope from="3">3</front>Sorry for putting my 2p here but you don't seriously think @n is an option. If you want to keep some kind of coherence ("interop"?) with analogous construct (cf. your second example), you should just rely on @from-@to. Or have I missed something.... ?
Council face-to-face 2013-04 agrees with this; EM to clarify by using a 'remarks' in the elementSpecs of locus, biblScope, and citedRange.
(For Laurent's benefit, we decided not use @n.)
Oxford 2013-11 face-to-face: EM to do before next teleconference.
Added <remark>s to explain usage when
a) only one page or unit is cited. = use @from, @to with identical value
b) only start page is cited. = use @from alone.
to the following elements: <locus>, <biblScope>, <citedRange>
Closed, as per comment above
Last edit: Elli Mylonas 2014-09-08