#726 definition needs definition

[Jens Østergaard Petersen]

CH-LanguagesCharacterSets.xml
/div/div[2]/div[6]/p[1]

and so the requirement that all such characters should be resolvable by XML processors to Unicode code points will not involve any definition or use of PUA code points.

definition => indirect representation via markup

[Hugh A. Cayless]

Assigning to Raffaele for review.

[rviglianti]

Why "indirect" and not just "any representation via markup or"?

[Jens Østergaard Petersen]

The section is already quite dense as it is, so instead of introducing a new term, I think it is best to provide coherence by linking back to "represented indirectly via markup" The words "or use" can be deleted, for why represent the code points without using them? The term "definition" gives the idea that you can decide yourself how to define these, and this is not true.

[rviglianti]

Thanks Jens, I agree! But It's not clear to me what you mean by "indirect" representation (as opposed to just representation).

[Jens Østergaard Petersen]

I see your point: if you represent something with something else, it is always indirect, no? Then I think "indirectly" should be removed as well. I just echoed this.

[rviglianti]

Fixed in revision 13188.