Menu ▾ ▴

#71 monogr: content model vs. examples

GREEN
closed-accepted
Lou Burnard
TEI: Definition of Elements/Attributes/Classes (128)
5
2009-03-18
2009-02-19
Kevin Hawkins
No

The content model for monogr currently requires use of one of the following as its first child:

author | editor | respStmt

However, the example includes none of these:

http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-monogr.html

Discussion

  • Lou Burnard

    Lou Burnard - 2009-03-14
    • milestone: --> GREEN
    • assigned_to: nobody --> louburnard
    • status: open --> open-accepted
     

  • Lou Burnard

    Lou Burnard - 2009-03-18
    • status: open-accepted --> closed-accepted
     

  • Lou Burnard

    Lou Burnard - 2009-03-18

    I think you may be misreading the current (admittedly complex) content model: it does permit omission of author|editor|respStmt as its first child -- it has to, else the examples would not validate!

    But I agree that an attributed book example would be useful, and have added one at rev 5814