and it appears twice in the chapter, so I suspect this is not a typo (although it may be confusing and unnecessary). Can someone who remembers the history of this file comment?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
and it appears twice in the chapter, so I suspect this is not a typo (although it may be confusing and unnecessary). Can someone who remembers the history of this file comment?
In the context, I don't see that anything else but "manuscript" is intended. If the TEI has a whole "Module for Manuscription Description", why is it not mentioned elsewhere? A locus "is used to reference a single location within a manuscription" makes some sense, I guess, but it is in any case an awfully stilted way of expression.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I agree, but I just want to make sure we don't step on the toes of a true expert for whom "manuscription" has a precise meaning that is especially apposite in this context.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I have corrected both occurrences to "manuscript". When we have "text bearing objects" or whatever we'll need to review all this vocabulary again anyway.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
"Manuscription" is a word:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manuscription
and it appears twice in the chapter, so I suspect this is not a typo (although it may be confusing and unnecessary). Can someone who remembers the history of this file comment?
Definitely a typo I think
Envoyé depuis mon HTC
----- Reply message -----
De : "Martin Holmes" martindholmes@users.sf.net
Pour : "[tei:bugs]" 640@bugs.tei.p.re.sf.net
Objet : [tei:bugs] #640 Manuscription Description
Date : mar., janv. 21, 2014 22:28
"Manuscription" is a word:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manuscription
and it appears twice in the chapter, so I suspect this is not a typo (although it may be confusing and unnecessary). Can someone who remembers the history of this file comment?
[bugs:#640]http://sourceforge.net/p/tei/bugs/640/ Manuscription Description
Status: open
Created: Tue Jan 21, 2014 06:24 PM UTC by Jens Østergaard Petersen
Last Updated: Tue Jan 21, 2014 06:24 PM UTC
Owner: nobody
Guidelines/en/MS-ManuscriptDescription.xml
/div/div[11]/head[1]
Manuscription Description
=>
Manuscript Description
Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/tei/bugs/640/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
also:
Guidelines/en/MS-ManuscriptDescription.xml
/div/div[3]/div[5]/p[2]
manuscription
=>
manuscript
In the context, I don't see that anything else but "manuscript" is intended. If the TEI has a whole "Module for Manuscription Description", why is it not mentioned elsewhere? A locus "is used to reference a single location within a manuscription" makes some sense, I guess, but it is in any case an awfully stilted way of expression.
I agree, but I just want to make sure we don't step on the toes of a true expert for whom "manuscription" has a precise meaning that is especially apposite in this context.
I have corrected both occurrences to "manuscript". When we have "text bearing objects" or whatever we'll need to review all this vocabulary again anyway.