#609 "lemma" used in a confusing way in CriticalApparatus.xml

[Jens Østergaard Petersen]

when there is reason to presume a sequence to the variants
on any one lemma.
=>
when there is reason to presume a sequence to the variants.

Or: when there is reason to presume a temporal sequence to the variants occurring in a single location.

(Here "lemma" seems to be used for a location of textual variation - I do not think "lemma" is used elsewhere in this sense. The sequence is of course temporal - does this need to be spelled out?)

[Jens Østergaard Petersen]

I see it is wrong to say that this use is not found elsewhere, but it is not a use defined in 12.1.2. What I mean is that the Guidelines say that you can do without lemmas (<lem>), but then uses "lemma" to signify any location of textual variation, which you cannot do without, as in "substantive variants of the lemma".

[Lou Burnard]

Agreed that we should remove "on any one lemma" ; done at rev 12611