|
From: Harald O. <har...@el...> - 2025-12-05 15:02:29
|
Marc, thanks for this great insight. A native speaker is GREAT ! For my German perception, "Wall clock" sounds a bit like a very historic device like a "cuckoo clock". Thanks for that, Harald Am 05.12.2025 um 15:54 schrieb Marc Culler: > The problem I see with "realtime" is that that word has a completely > different meaning in linux: see: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Realtime_kernel <https:// > wiki.archlinux.org/title/Realtime_kernel> > > The meaning of wallclock is very clear. It would also reduce ambiguity > to use "real" instead of "realtime" since that is what the linux time > command uses (see man time) which claims to be following POSIX standard > 1003.2. > > - Marc > > - Marc > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 4:21 AM Harald Oehlmann > <har...@el... <mailto:har...@el...>> wrote: > > Am 04.12.2025 um 11:02 schrieb Christian Werner: > > On 12/04/2025 10:39 AM, Harald Oehlmann wrote: > > > >> ... > >> - will have a new type "wallclock". > >> > >> -> To native speakers: Is this a good term ? > > > > Speaking for POSIX their termini are CLOCK_REALTIME (= wall > clock) vs. > > CLOCK_MONOTONIC. > > Maybe "realtime" and "monotonic" then? > > > > Cheers, > > Christian > This is a brilliant idea. In my IBM PC from 1986, there was a chip > called "RTC "Real time clock" with a battery on the top. > What about this: > > clock microseconds ?-realtime|-monotonic? (default: -realtime for > backward compatibility) > > % timer info $id > cmd monotonic 12345 > cmd realtime 45678 > cmd idle > > where the number is the invocation time point in the given timer. > > % after info $id > cmd timer (for both, monotonic and realtime) > cmd idle > > I will also replace the word "wall clock" by "realtime" in the TIP. > > Thanks again, > Harald |