|
From: Reinhard M. <rei...@m4...> - 2023-05-12 09:16:20
|
Hi, Am 12.05.2023 08:43, schrieb Poor Yorick: > If it's a commit, then people know exactly what they are voting on. The > idea is that a vote is analogous to a decision to approve the merge > request. If any additional changes are made, and a merge request > supersedes a previous request, then the vote starts fresh on the new > request. The merge would not normally be a cherry pick. ah, but then the term "specific commit" is maybe a bit misleading (at least I think it misled me). We're not talking about the changes of a single commit on a branch, but about the state on a branch at a specific point in time (or after a specific commit), including any earlier commits on that branch, but exluding any later. Right? cu Reinhard |