From: Donald A. <as...@tr...> - 2012-10-18 10:32:15
|
"Donal K. Fellows" <don...@ma...> writes: > On 16/10/2012 23:48, Alexandre Ferrieux wrote: > > Is there a reason why the bytecode for the above couldn't somehow be > > optimized to become the one generated by the TIPped function ? > > Yes. > > Oh, you wanted to know the reason? :-) The problem is that we've never > done anything that optimizes bytecode across command boundaries; it is > terra incognita. Yeah. I wanna see set foo [something with big $foo] optimized a-la-K Donald Arseneau as...@tr... |