From: Donal K. F. <don...@ma...> - 2010-05-04 07:54:48
|
On 04/05/2010 01:40, Colin McCormack wrote: > It seems to me that this conversation might be better framed in a > different context: How could Tcl evolve the event system in such a way > as to provide more facility and introspection? > > This is the kind of conversation that useful functional extensions are > made on. I've long been of the view that UDP (for example) is best > represented as an event stream. It's definitely a drum-beat I could see myself doing some marching to. (And +1 for what you say on UDP.) Donal. |