Re: [TCLCORE] CFV TIP #348 - Substituted 'errorStack' / 'traceback'

[Alexandre F. <ale...@gm...>]

On 10/9/09, Kevin Kenny <kev...@gm...> wrote:
>
>  On the other hand, Joe's and Daniel's criticisms suggest that
>  the TIP isn't fully baked.

Yes, I admit the CFV was possibly a bit hurried. It is my fault, I
asked Jeff and Andreas for sponsorship, and they were very fast to
help me finish it and test it. When they proposed the CFV I didn't
react, thinking we had no need for an extra discussion step, since (1)
the ::tcl namespace issue had been raised before and (2) I was under
the impression that 8.6 was imminent.

Now I can see I was wrong, so my proposition is to SEND IT BACK as
Daniel says, and enter the discussion step instead. See my answer to
Daniel to proceed on the API definition.

-Alex