|
From: Alexandre F. <ale...@gm...> - 2008-08-28 22:12:36
|
Lars, I'd really appreciate your answer to this. Regards, -Alex On 8/27/08, Alexandre Ferrieux <ale...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Lars Hellström > <Lar...@re...> wrote: > > [suspend/resume, serialization of state] > > Lars, aside from the discussion on the How, I'd like a bit more on the Why. > Specifically, I fail to map your "basic premise" example onto a > realistic engineering need. > > Also, from time to time people hint at the fact that passing a > continuation or coroutine across the thread/interp boundary would be > Overly Cool, but again I'd like a few examples of what real problems > this would solve. > > Notice that here I'm not concentrating on the coroutine/continuation > difference. One motivation is that I predict that the free-floating > (as in "unordered") refcounted "stack" frames will be teleported from > Miguel's mind to silicon in no time (considering the timescale of the > 8.5 release ;-). So basically I assume that today's anchoring of > coroutine-sequels to the toplevel won't last long enough to be called > a limitation of the model ! > > -Alex > |