|
From: miguel s. <mig...@gm...> - 2008-01-17 00:41:00
|
Alexandre Ferrieux wrote: >> PS: if/when you get around to it, I'd be mightily interested in the >> semantics of what you are trying to do. Can't have an opinion or help in >> implementation until I understand ... and that thread on clt was just >> too much. If you ever summarize it ... > > Look near the end, I have tried to illustrate the script-level aspects: > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.tcl/tree/browse_frm/thread/b6c26a33f5ebd3e0/c8c452ad6386d7b2?hl=en&rnum=91&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fcomp.lang.tcl%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fb6c26a33f5ebd3e0%3Fhl%3Den%26#doc_5966ecb98c4ad8a6 Not what I need right now :( That there talks a lot about the implementation aspects - Tcl_Objs and stringReps and generation counters and whatHaveYou. What I am missing is the perspective of the script writer - the changes (if any) to Tcl.n, the manpage for whatever new commands you'll define, manpage changes elsewhere. IOW, I cannot process the "how do we get there" until I really grokked where "there" is. Not requesting that you write all of that s**t for me, but could use some help in getting the big picture. Cheers Miguel |