From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-12-27 03:20:09
|
Bugs item #1591494, was opened at 2006-11-06 09:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112997&aid=1591494&group_id=12997 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: 67. Unix Window Operations Group: current: 8.5a5 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 1 Private: No Submitted By: Larry W. Virden (lvirden) Assigned to: Joe English (jenglish) Summary: unixSelect 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 failure on tk cvs head Initial Comment: tk 8.5 cvs head built with solaris 9 sun c compiler and test suite display via exceed 10.0.0.12 on win xp unixSelect.test ==== unixSelect-1.4 TkSelGetSelection procedure: simple i18n text, iso2022 FAILED ==== Contents of test case: setupbg setup selection handle -type COMPOUND_TEXT -format COMPOUND_TEXT . {handler COMPOUND _TEXT} selection own . set selValue \u00fc\u0444 set selInfo {} set result [dobg { set x [selection get -type COMPOUND_TEXT] list [string equal \u00fc\u0444 $x] [string length $x] [string bytelength $x] }] cleanupbg lappend result $selInfo ---- Result was: 1 2 4 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000} ---- Result should have been (exact matching): 1 2 4 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000} ==== unixSelect-1.4 FAILED ==== unixSelect-1.5 TkSelGetSelection procedure: INCR i18n text, iso2022 FAILED ==== Contents of test case: # This test is subtle. The selection ends up getting fetched twice by # Tk: once to compute the length, and again to actually send the data. # The first time through, we don't convert the data to ISO2022, so the # buffer boundaries end up being different in the two passes. setupbg setup selection handle -type COMPOUND_TEXT -format COMPOUND_TEXT . {handler COMPOUND _TEXT} selection own . set selValue [string repeat x 3999]\u00fc\u0444[string repeat x 3999] set selInfo {} set result [dobg { set x [selection get -type COMPOUND_TEXT] list [string equal [string repeat x 3999]\u00fc\u0444[string repeat x 3999 ] $x] [string length $x] [string bytelength $x] }] cleanupbg lappend result $selInfo ---- Result was: 1 8000 8002 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000 3999 COMPOUND_TEXT 7998 4000 C OMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000 3999 COMPOUND_TEXT 7998 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000 3998 COMPOUND_TEXT 7997 4000} ---- Result should have been (exact matching): 1 8000 8002 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000 3999 COMPOUND_TEXT 7998 4000 C OMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 4000 3998 COMPOUND_TEXT 7997 4000} ==== unixSelect-1.5 FAILED ==== unixSelect-1.6 TkSelGetSelection procedure: simple i18n text, iso2022 FAILED ==== Contents of test case: setupbg setup selection handle -type COMPOUND_TEXT -format COMPOUND_TEXT . {handler COMPOUND _TEXT} selection own . set selValue \u00fc\u0444 set selInfo {} set result [dobg { set x [selection get -type COMPOUND_TEXT] list [string equal \u00fc\u0444 $x] [string length $x] [string bytelength $x] }] cleanupbg lappend result $selInfo ---- Result was: 1 2 4 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000 COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000} ---- Result should have been (exact matching): 1 2 4 {COMPOUND_TEXT 0 4000} ==== unixSelect-1.6 FAILED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2006-12-26 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry W. Virden (lvirden) Date: 2006-11-13 05:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15949 what does "missing encodings" mean? I have installed the tcl 8.5 cvs head that matches this tk. If something is missing, it would be missing from that tcl, right? Just confused on what this is all about. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe English (jenglish) Date: 2006-11-12 16:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=68433 Can't replicate; possibly due to missing encodings? Since these tests are about COMPOUND_TEXT selection targets (which should be considered obsolete), this is low-priority unless and until any actual related end-user problems are found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112997&aid=1591494&group_id=12997 |