From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-01-18 02:57:13
|
Bugs item #219145, was opened at 2000-10-25 22:02 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110894&aid=219145&group_id=10894 Category: 07. Variables Group: = 8.0.3 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Kevin B KENNY (kennykb) Summary: traces on nonexistent variables Initial Comment: OriginalBugID: 875 RFE Version: 8.0.3 SubmitDate: '1998-11-25' LastModified: '2000-02-22' Severity: LOW Status: Assigned Submitter: pat ChangedBy: hobbs RelatedBugIDs: 752 4213 OS: All FixedDate: '2000-10-25' FixedInVersion: NA ClosedDate: '2000-10-25' This is another problem pointed out by Kevin Kenny in his Tcl/Tk Conference paper. Tcl and Tk are missing several pieces of introspection that are meeting to find memory leaks. Right now there are no Tcl commands that can be invoked to find out about traces on nonexistent variables Something like 'trace vunknown'. -- 02/22/2000 hobbs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Joe English (jenglish) Date: 2003-01-17 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=68433 [trace vinfo] works on nonexistant variables: % trace variable a w someProc % trace vinfo a {w someProc} % info exists a 0 This works as far back as Tcl 7.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Porter (dgp) Date: 2002-07-05 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=80530 1) Is this still correct? 2) Should there be a FR to fill in the missing introspection? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110894&aid=219145&group_id=10894 |