From: Donal K. F. <don...@ma...> - 2007-01-29 18:30:41
|
Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > Yes, the new command might take 50% of the time of current-style > implementation in a tight loop, but who would just evaluate > list-lengths (and do nothing with result) in a tight loop? Actually, in compiled contexts the speed will be identical since the bytecode sequences will be identical. This TIP only affects ease of use and not performance. Donal. |