From: Donal K. F. <don...@ma...> - 2006-11-20 09:54:06
|
Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > Ok, It all boils down to: why dont't we auto-ensemble namespaces? > (at least those, that do [namespace export], and only for the > exported subcommands) Funnily enough, that's what the original TIP#112 proposal was about. > One argument against doing so is, that it might break old code > which depends on procedures/commands having same name as existing > namespaces. And IIRC that was why I dropped that part of it. Auto-ensemble is nice, but breaks more code than I was willing to tolerate in a minor version change. I don't recommend using the name of a namespace for any command that is not the "auto-ensemble" of the command though. The idea hasn't gone away! :-) Donal. |