From: Benjamin R. <Ben...@ep...> - 2003-11-24 21:30:55
|
Hi Donal, "Donal K. Fellows" <don...@ma...> writes: > What I don't know is whether there are any compiler options we could > set (perhaps just optionally, of course) to enforce this policy. For GCC see the options -Wimplicit-function-declaration, -Wstrict-prototypes, -Wmissing-prototypes. > (In a war between a prototype and a declaration, the first one to > occur should win. The specs are quite clear on this, ?? See my other post about the C89 spec. benny |