From: Fabian F. <fa...@pa...> - 2006-03-24 14:56:49
|
> (11:00:05) darco: The whole way modules are handled could use a > re-write, but I doubt that will happen anytime soon considering that it > "kinda works" and isn't a very sexy thing for anyone to work on Darco, could you elaborate a little on the background of the current module loader? Why did you choose to implement a module loader instead of build-time linking with libsynfig? Was it to support third-party or custom modules without requiring access to the then-closed source? Something else? (Just asking to record history, maybe it'll be useful to know if someone decides to do a rewrite. It's also of relevance when thinking about licensing.) Cheers, --=20 Fabian Fagerholm <fa...@pa...> |