|
From: Daniel G. <da...@fp...> - 2005-06-07 19:41:23
|
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 20:30 +0100, Kristian Van Der Vliet wrote: > On Tuesday 07 June 2005 15:57, Dag Wastberg wrote: > > On 6/3/05, Rick Caudill <syl...@ho...> wrote: > > > So I finally started to code again last night and got some of the > > > FontRequester done :) You can see a screenshot here: > > > http://students.cup.edu/cau0730/fontrequester.png > > > > This got me thinking a bit about UI and selecting fonts, and I really > > don't think that most font names mean much to most users. Personally > > I generally know if I want a fixed width or proportional font, and > > perhaps if I want serif or sans-serif or perhaps if I want a script > > like font, but this doesn't help me select a font, and I still have to > > click on all of them to see what they look like. > > What we need to do (& what I intend to do at some point) is modify the font > management so that font aliases can be created. Then an application can > simply request a serif font and get the default font configured as the serif, > or a web page can specify Times New Roman and ABrowse can display a > Times-like font. That's just not a huge priority right now though. > One thing I've seen (I want to say it was in Word Perfect) was a font selector where the name of each font was in that font. That gives you a pretty good idea of what the font looks like. Daniel |