From: JP <pet...@ro...> - 2007-05-24 22:06:19
|
I guess HandleClassMethodAction also gives you the benefit of not having to fully-qualify the class provided you put it in the default package, which is helpful. --- JP <pet...@ro...> wrote: > Just wondering why we have HandleClassMethodAction when we also have > XPathAction, and JXPath is capable of calling static methods (see > "static method" example under "Standard Extension Functions"): > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jxpath/users-guide.html#Extension_Functions > > So what does HandleClassMethodAction give you that the standard > JXPath > support in XPathAction doesn't give you? Is it just a convenience so > you don't have to add the "xpath:" prefix? > > -JP > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Take > the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, > news, photos & more. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Swixat-devel mailing list > Swi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/swixat-devel > ____________________________________________________________________________________Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing. http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php |