Menu
▾
▴
svgdomcsharp-developers
|
From: <AW...@UR...> - 2002-02-17 17:10:29
Attachments:
css.zip
SharpVector.build
|
I think the c# style is the way to go.
I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in
progress...).
What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs??
Don't the underscores need to go?
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Kackman
To: svg...@li...
Sent: 2/17/2002 11:55 AM
Subject: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions
Now that it sounds like we're all in agreement about using .NET naming
conventions I think we need to create some guidelines for how exactly to
convert the Java interface syntax to C#.
As Don already mentioned prepending a capital "I" to each interface
would be
the first step.
My main question is what do we do with Java getter and setter methods?
Since
Java doesn't have C#'s property syntax they use a lot of getProperty and
setProperty(value) methods.
Namely should this member:
string getNamespaceURI();
be left as is or converted to this:
string NamespaceURI { get; }
This goes a little beyond mere naming issues as C# properties slightly
change the smemantics of property accessors.
I would vote we switch to the C# style as it will again feel more
natural to
.NET programmers.
Do we need a guidelines document for this project? Both to inform those
of
use who will be doing the conversion and those who will eventually be
consuming the library and will need to know how exactly our stuff
compares
to the w3c defined stuff.
don kackman
-----Original Message-----
From: svg...@li...
[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of
Don XML
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 8:24 PM
To: svg...@li...
Subject: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] C# Source Code
Here's a zip file with the converted Batik interfaces (plus a couple
classes), along with the UML for Visio Arch (I think there is a free
viewer
if you don't have Visio). I started to go thru the DOM interfaces and
compare them to the W3C. If anyone else wants to grab another section
of
code and start fixing, go right ahead. I think we all agree the
changing
the interfaces slightly to me .Net naming conventions is the "right"
thing
to do. BTW, I found a Java binding example in the W3C Core DOM
documentation, and there are naming standard changes, so I guess it is
alright.
DX
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
_______________________________________________
Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list
Svg...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers
|
|
From: Don X. <do...@ho...> - 2002-02-17 18:13:51
|
Cool! Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core. I totally agree with the other points. In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we couldn't do the same. And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C. DX >From: AW...@UR... >To: svg...@li... >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500 > > >I think the c# style is the way to go. > >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in >progress...). > >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs?? >Don't the underscores need to go? > > >Andrew > _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com |
|
From: Donald K. <do...@it...> - 2002-02-17 20:59:44
|
Don, When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean? Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in w3c\dom? I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it. don kackman PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group messages which reply to the group address. -----Original Message----- From: svg...@li... [mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of Don XML Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM To: svg...@li... Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions Cool! Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core. I totally agree with the other points. In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we couldn't do the same. And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C. DX >From: AW...@UR... >To: svg...@li... >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500 > > >I think the c# style is the way to go. > >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in >progress...). > >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs?? >Don't the underscores need to go? > > >Andrew > _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _______________________________________________ Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list Svg...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers |
|
From: Don X. <do...@ho...> - 2002-02-17 22:28:56
|
Yeah, I ran into the same problem with the replies. As for DOM Core, just the stuff in the W3C/DOM. DX >From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> >To: svg...@li... >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:59:41 -0600 > >Don, > >When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean? > >Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in >w3c\dom? > >I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it. > >don kackman > >PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when >replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a >mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group >messages which reply to the group address. > >-----Original Message----- >From: svg...@li... >[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of >Don XML >Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM >To: svg...@li... >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > >Cool! Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core. I totally agree >with the other points. In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like >they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we >couldn't do the same. And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to >EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C. > >DX > > > >From: AW...@UR... > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500 > > > > > >I think the c# style is the way to go. > > > >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in > >progress...). > > > >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs?? > >Don't the underscores need to go? > > > > > >Andrew > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > >_______________________________________________ >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list >Svg...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > >_______________________________________________ >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list >Svg...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com |
|
From: Kurt C. <ku...@ku...> - 2002-02-17 23:00:49
|
Not meaning to disrupt the activities here, but I have a question that one of you may be able to help me with. I'm trying to instantiate an ActiveXObject within a script in SVG, and the engine isn't letting me do it. Has anyone run into this particular problem, and if so, how to fix it? -- Kurt |
|
From: Donald K. <do...@it...> - 2002-02-17 22:37:45
Attachments:
SharpVectors Coding Conventions.doc
|
Sounds good. If nobody has a problem with what I did with DOMException please include the change from my previous post. I have attached a very quickly compiled coding conventions document (attached). This is just meant to organize some of the decisions we are making on this list so we have them all written down. don kackman PS Is SharpVectors all one word or two? -----Original Message----- From: svg...@li... [mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of Don XML Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:29 PM To: svg...@li... Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions Yeah, I ran into the same problem with the replies. As for DOM Core, just the stuff in the W3C/DOM. DX >From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> >To: svg...@li... >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:59:41 -0600 > >Don, > >When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean? > >Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in >w3c\dom? > >I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it. > >don kackman > >PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when >replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a >mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group >messages which reply to the group address. > >-----Original Message----- >From: svg...@li... >[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of >Don XML >Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM >To: svg...@li... >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > >Cool! Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core. I totally agree >with the other points. In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like >they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we >couldn't do the same. And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to >EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C. > >DX > > > >From: AW...@UR... > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500 > > > > > >I think the c# style is the way to go. > > > >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in > >progress...). > > > >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs?? > >Don't the underscores need to go? > > > > > >Andrew > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > >_______________________________________________ >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list >Svg...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > >_______________________________________________ >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list >Svg...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _______________________________________________ Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list Svg...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers |
|
From: Donald K. <do...@it...> - 2002-02-17 22:48:26
Attachments:
svg.zip
events.zip
|
I've done the w3c\dom\events collection of files. I went ahead with the change to DOMException and made EventExcpetion inherit from that. If we decide not to go that route I will roll that back. Also attached is the contents of the w3c\dom\svg directory. Since I changed interface names in events to include the "I", I have also updated all references to those types in the w3c\dom\svg set of classes. Since the w3c\dom\svg is the fulcrum upon which all of the other naming changes will pivot, we'll probably need to be kind of careful with that set of files. Renaming all Event interface type references is the only change I made to w3c\dom\svg. Also should we also rename interface file names to include the "I"; e.g change Event.cs to IEvent.cs? don kackman PS Don, you're right. This is fun! -----Original Message----- From: svg...@li... [mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of Don XML Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:29 PM To: svg...@li... Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions Yeah, I ran into the same problem with the replies. As for DOM Core, just the stuff in the W3C/DOM. DX >From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> >To: svg...@li... >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:59:41 -0600 > >Don, > >When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean? > >Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in >w3c\dom? > >I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it. > >don kackman > >PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when >replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a >mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group >messages which reply to the group address. > >-----Original Message----- >From: svg...@li... >[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of >Don XML >Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM >To: svg...@li... >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > >Cool! Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core. I totally agree >with the other points. In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like >they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we >couldn't do the same. And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to >EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C. > >DX > > > >From: AW...@UR... > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500 > > > > > >I think the c# style is the way to go. > > > >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in > >progress...). > > > >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs?? > >Don't the underscores need to go? > > > > > >Andrew > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > >_______________________________________________ >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list >Svg...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > >_______________________________________________ >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list >Svg...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers _________________________________________________________________ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com _______________________________________________ Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list Svg...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers |
|
From: Kurt C. <ku...@ku...> - 2002-02-17 23:04:27
|
Also, I think we should get into the habit of including in the interfaces versioning and authoring information - who did what when. I know this is partially covered under the SourceForge CVS, but it makes it easier to follow if I'm looking at a local version of the interfaces. -- Kurt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> To: <svg...@li...> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 2:48 PM Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > I've done the w3c\dom\events collection of files. > > I went ahead with the change to DOMException and made EventExcpetion inherit > from that. If we decide not to go that route I will roll that back. > > Also attached is the contents of the w3c\dom\svg directory. Since I changed > interface names in events to include the "I", I have also updated all > references to those types in the w3c\dom\svg set of classes. > > Since the w3c\dom\svg is the fulcrum upon which all of the other naming > changes will pivot, we'll probably need to be kind of careful with that set > of files. Renaming all Event interface type references is the only change I > made to w3c\dom\svg. > > Also should we also rename interface file names to include the "I"; e.g > change Event.cs to IEvent.cs? > > don kackman > > PS Don, you're right. This is fun! > > -----Original Message----- > From: svg...@li... > [mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of > Don XML > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:29 PM > To: svg...@li... > Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > > Yeah, I ran into the same problem with the replies. As for DOM Core, just > the stuff in the W3C/DOM. > > DX > > > >From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:59:41 -0600 > > > >Don, > > > >When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean? > > > >Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in > >w3c\dom? > > > >I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it. > > > >don kackman > > > >PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when > >replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a > >mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group > >messages which reply to the group address. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: svg...@li... > >[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of > >Don XML > >Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > > > > >Cool! Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core. I totally agree > >with the other points. In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like > >they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we > >couldn't do the same. And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to > >EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C. > > > >DX > > > > > > >From: AW...@UR... > > >To: svg...@li... > > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500 > > > > > > > > >I think the c# style is the way to go. > > > > > >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in > > >progress...). > > > > > >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs?? > > >Don't the underscores need to go? > > > > > > > > >Andrew > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > >Svg...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > >Svg...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > Svg...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > |
|
From: Don X. <do...@ho...> - 2002-02-17 23:02:51
|
>From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> >PS Don, you're right. This is fun! As long as we are learning and working together this will stay fun. We also need to remember to get away from the computer and interact with other humans once in a while. For me, it's cold outside (I'm in northern New Jersey), there's no NHL, just Olympic Hockey (not bad, but the good games are later this week), and I have a rare Sunday without stuff to do with the wife and kids. DX _________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com |
|
From: Donald K. <do...@it...> - 2002-02-17 23:14:28
|
good idea. -----Original Message----- From: svg...@li... [mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of Kurt Cagle Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 5:06 PM To: svg...@li... Subject: Re: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions Also, I think we should get into the habit of including in the interfaces versioning and authoring information - who did what when. I know this is partially covered under the SourceForge CVS, but it makes it easier to follow if I'm looking at a local version of the interfaces. -- Kurt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> To: <svg...@li...> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 2:48 PM Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > I've done the w3c\dom\events collection of files. > > I went ahead with the change to DOMException and made EventExcpetion inherit > from that. If we decide not to go that route I will roll that back. > > Also attached is the contents of the w3c\dom\svg directory. Since I changed > interface names in events to include the "I", I have also updated all > references to those types in the w3c\dom\svg set of classes. > > Since the w3c\dom\svg is the fulcrum upon which all of the other naming > changes will pivot, we'll probably need to be kind of careful with that set > of files. Renaming all Event interface type references is the only change I > made to w3c\dom\svg. > > Also should we also rename interface file names to include the "I"; e.g > change Event.cs to IEvent.cs? > > don kackman > > PS Don, you're right. This is fun! > > -----Original Message----- > From: svg...@li... > [mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of > Don XML > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:29 PM > To: svg...@li... > Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > > Yeah, I ran into the same problem with the replies. As for DOM Core, just > the stuff in the W3C/DOM. > > DX > > > >From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:59:41 -0600 > > > >Don, > > > >When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean? > > > >Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in > >w3c\dom? > > > >I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it. > > > >don kackman > > > >PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when > >replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a > >mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group > >messages which reply to the group address. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: svg...@li... > >[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of > >Don XML > >Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > > > > >Cool! Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core. I totally agree > >with the other points. In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like > >they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we > >couldn't do the same. And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to > >EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C. > > > >DX > > > > > > >From: AW...@UR... > > >To: svg...@li... > > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500 > > > > > > > > >I think the c# style is the way to go. > > > > > >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in > > >progress...). > > > > > >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs?? > > >Don't the underscores need to go? > > > > > > > > >Andrew > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > >Svg...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > >Svg...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > Svg...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > _______________________________________________ Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list Svg...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers |
|
From: Donald K. <do...@it...> - 2002-02-18 13:36:51
|
We should probably also be inserting the LGPL header into the files we're each working with. SharpDevelop has a tool button for this. don kackman -----Original Message----- From: svg...@li... [mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of Kurt Cagle Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 5:06 PM To: svg...@li... Subject: Re: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions Also, I think we should get into the habit of including in the interfaces versioning and authoring information - who did what when. I know this is partially covered under the SourceForge CVS, but it makes it easier to follow if I'm looking at a local version of the interfaces. -- Kurt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> To: <svg...@li...> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 2:48 PM Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > I've done the w3c\dom\events collection of files. > > I went ahead with the change to DOMException and made EventExcpetion inherit > from that. If we decide not to go that route I will roll that back. > > Also attached is the contents of the w3c\dom\svg directory. Since I changed > interface names in events to include the "I", I have also updated all > references to those types in the w3c\dom\svg set of classes. > > Since the w3c\dom\svg is the fulcrum upon which all of the other naming > changes will pivot, we'll probably need to be kind of careful with that set > of files. Renaming all Event interface type references is the only change I > made to w3c\dom\svg. > > Also should we also rename interface file names to include the "I"; e.g > change Event.cs to IEvent.cs? > > don kackman > > PS Don, you're right. This is fun! > > -----Original Message----- > From: svg...@li... > [mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of > Don XML > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:29 PM > To: svg...@li... > Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > > Yeah, I ran into the same problem with the replies. As for DOM Core, just > the stuff in the W3C/DOM. > > DX > > > >From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...> > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:59:41 -0600 > > > >Don, > > > >When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean? > > > >Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in > >w3c\dom? > > > >I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it. > > > >don kackman > > > >PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when > >replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a > >mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group > >messages which reply to the group address. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: svg...@li... > >[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of > >Don XML > >Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM > >To: svg...@li... > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > > > > >Cool! Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core. I totally agree > >with the other points. In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like > >they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we > >couldn't do the same. And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to > >EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C. > > > >DX > > > > > > >From: AW...@UR... > > >To: svg...@li... > > >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions > > >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500 > > > > > > > > >I think the c# style is the way to go. > > > > > >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in > > >progress...). > > > > > >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs?? > > >Don't the underscores need to go? > > > > > > > > >Andrew > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > >Svg...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > >Svg...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list > Svg...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers > _______________________________________________ Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list Svg...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X