RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions

[Donald K. <do...@it...>]

I've done the w3c\dom\events collection of files.

I went ahead with the change to DOMException and made EventExcpetion inherit
from that. If we decide not to go that route I will roll that back.

Also attached is the contents of the w3c\dom\svg directory. Since I changed
interface names in events to include the "I", I have also updated all
references to those types in the w3c\dom\svg set of classes.

Since the w3c\dom\svg is the fulcrum upon which all of the other naming
changes will pivot, we'll probably need to be kind of careful with that set
of files. Renaming all Event interface type references is the only change I
made to w3c\dom\svg.

Also should we also rename interface file names to include the "I"; e.g
change Event.cs to IEvent.cs?

don kackman

PS Don, you're right. This is fun!

-----Original Message-----
From: svg...@li...
[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of
Don XML
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:29 PM
To: svg...@li...
Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions


Yeah, I ran into the same problem with the replies.  As for DOM Core, just
the stuff in the W3C/DOM.

DX


>From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...>
>To: svg...@li...
>Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions
>Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:59:41 -0600
>
>Don,
>
>When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean?
>
>Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in
>w3c\dom?
>
>I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it.
>
>don kackman
>
>PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when
>replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a
>mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group
>messages which reply to the group address.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: svg...@li...
>[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of
>Don XML
>Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM
>To: svg...@li...
>Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions
>
>
>Cool!  Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core.  I totally agree
>with the other points.  In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like
>they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we
>couldn't do the same.  And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to
>EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C.
>
>DX
>
>
> >From: AW...@UR...
> >To: svg...@li...
> >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions
> >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500
> >
> >
> >I think the c# style is the way to go.
> >
> >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in
> >progress...).
> >
> >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs??
> >Don't the underscores need to go?
> >
> >
> >Andrew
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list
>Svg...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list
>Svg...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers




_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


_______________________________________________
Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list
Svg...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers