RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions

[Donald K. <do...@it...>]

Sounds good. If nobody has a problem with what I did with DOMException
please include the change from my previous post.

I have attached a very quickly compiled coding conventions document
(attached). This is just meant to organize some of the decisions we are
making on this list so we have them all written down.

don kackman

PS Is SharpVectors all one word or two?

-----Original Message-----
From: svg...@li...
[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of
Don XML
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 4:29 PM
To: svg...@li...
Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions


Yeah, I ran into the same problem with the replies.  As for DOM Core, just
the stuff in the W3C/DOM.

DX


>From: "Donald Kackman" <do...@it...>
>To: svg...@li...
>Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions
>Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:59:41 -0600
>
>Don,
>
>When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean?
>
>Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in
>w3c\dom?
>
>I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it.
>
>don kackman
>
>PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when
>replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a
>mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group
>messages which reply to the group address.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: svg...@li...
>[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of
>Don XML
>Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM
>To: svg...@li...
>Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions
>
>
>Cool!  Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core.  I totally agree
>with the other points.  In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like
>they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we
>couldn't do the same.  And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to
>EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C.
>
>DX
>
>
> >From: AW...@UR...
> >To: svg...@li...
> >Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions
> >Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500
> >
> >
> >I think the c# style is the way to go.
> >
> >I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in
> >progress...).
> >
> >What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs??
> >Don't the underscores need to go?
> >
> >
> >Andrew
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list
>Svg...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list
>Svg...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers




_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com


_______________________________________________
Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list
Svg...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers