RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions

[Donald K. <do...@it...>]

Don,

When you say DOM core which set of class do you mean?

Are you doing w3c\dom\svg or the whole w3c\dom or just the set directly in
w3c\dom?

I'll start on w3c\dom\events if noone else has got it.

don kackman

PS Just in case noone has noticed yet you need to use "reply to all" when
replyng to this group. Otherwise it just goes to the author which is a
mistake I've made a couple of times now, being used to the Yahoo Group
messages which reply to the group address.

-----Original Message-----
From: svg...@li...
[mailto:svg...@li...]On Behalf Of
Don XML
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 12:14 PM
To: svg...@li...
Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions


Cool!  Andrew is doing the CSS and I'll do the DOM core.  I totally agree
with the other points.  In comparing the W3C IDL to the Java, it looks like
they made some changes when implementing it in Java, so I can't see why we
couldn't do the same.  And while we are at it, since C# was submitted to
EMCA as a standard, we should send the C# bindings to the W3C.

DX


>From: AW...@UR...
>To: svg...@li...
>Subject: RE: [Svgdomcsharp-developers] Conversion conventions
>Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:12:25 -0500
>
>
>I think the c# style is the way to go.
>
>I made most of changes to the w3c\css\**.cs files (still a work in
>progress...).
>
>What about removing/changing fields to enums e.g. LexicalUnit_Fields.cs??
>Don't the underscores need to go?
>
>
>Andrew
>

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


_______________________________________________
Svgdomcsharp-developers mailing list
Svg...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/svgdomcsharp-developers