Re: [Supertuxkart-devel] Audio format

[M G. <aur...@gm...>]

> Yes it would, thought most likely I will want to keep it in the
> source, the same way bullet is handled now.
>
> If I understand how ogg vorbis works, a higher compression means a
> higher data loss.
>
> But more important, it does not makes sense to sacrifice quality for
> compression; it's best *not* to use FLAC to avoid a dependency and if
> for some reason the inclusion within our source tree isn't desired.
> The biggest wav sound we have is just 24Kb!
>
> -Coz
>
>   

Well I meant the other way around = low compression / high quality ;)
I personnaly don't see any urge to move away from wav (moving from .rgb 
to .png is IMO much much much more important) but just wanted to point 
out moving to ogg would give somewhat smaller files with no audible 
difference