super-tux-devel

[Super-tux-devel] windows binaries

[Matze B. <ma...@br...>]

Hi,

I just created windows binaries and an installer for the 0.1.1 release. 
You can find it here (please upload them to sourceforge tobias):

	http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uxsm/supertux-0.1.1-setup.exe

Greetings,
	Matze

Re: [Super-tux-devel] windows binaries

[Tobias <tob...@gm...>]

Am Di, den 11.05.2004 um 12:29 Uhr +0200 schrieb Matze Braun:
> Hi,
> 
> I just created windows binaries and an installer for the 0.1.1 release. 
> You can find it here (please upload them to sourceforge tobias):
> 
> 	http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uxsm/supertux-0.1.1-setup.exe

Thanks! I planed to upload them there.

Greetz...

Tobias Gläßer

Re: [Super-tux-devel] windows binaries

[Ricardo C. <ri...@ae...>]

 I've just give it a try to SuperTux in Windows 98 and it worked very well.=
 I=20
was able to change between OpenGL and SDL, Window and FullScreen for a few=
=20
times... without probs and pretty fast.

 The only probs I had was a crash when i double-pressed the icon... I think=
=20
that was just one of the usualls windows messages to not keep the operating=
=20
system use boring :)
 Once when i changed between video modes, the mouse stopped moving... I gue=
ss=20
we can attribute this fault to MS as well.

Cheers,

 Ricardo Cruz

Em Ter=C3=A7a, 11 de Maio de 2004 12:56, o Tobias Gl=C3=A4=C3=9Fer escreveu:
> Am Di, den 11.05.2004 um 12:29 Uhr +0200 schrieb Matze Braun:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just created windows binaries and an installer for the 0.1.1 release.
> > You can find it here (please upload them to sourceforge tobias):
> >
> > 	http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uxsm/supertux-0.1.1-setup.exe
>
> Thanks! I planed to upload them there.
>
> Greetz...
>
> Tobias Gl=C3=A4=C3=9Fer
>
>
=2D-=20
Well, I'm INVISIBLE AGAIN ... I might as well pay a visit to the LADIES=20
ROOM ...

Re: [Super-tux-devel] windows binaries

[Benjamin P. J. <bp...@gm...>]

> I've just give it a try to SuperTux in Windows 98 and it worked very well. I 
>was able to change between OpenGL and SDL, Window and FullScreen for a few 
>times... without probs and pretty fast.
>
> The only probs I had was a crash when i double-pressed the icon... I think 
>that was just one of the usualls windows messages to not keep the operating 
>system use boring :)
> Once when i changed between video modes, the mouse stopped moving... I guess 
>we can attribute this fault to MS as well.
>
>
>  
>
I've been giving the Windows binaries a try under Win2k on my old
P2-266 Notebook ... installation made no problems.
To noone's surprise I had a very low framerate
(~ 12fps) and OpenGL mode made the game drop
below 3fps -- hmmm: didn't crash the machine so I guess it's working
as supposed to. I'm not able to report on fullscreen issues since my
old Thinkpad 770E doesn't support resolutions < 1024x768 ...
in other words: fullscreen worked quite well: gave me a 640x480
window with a black border 'round it in less than 5 secs. :-)


Benjamin

Re: [Super-tux-devel] windows binaries

[Ricardo C. <ri...@ae...>]

 The OpenGL fps wouldn't suprise me, in case you don't have an accelerated=
=20
card or the drivers are not installed...
 About the software rendering, it is too slow... Well, SuperTux (in my P4)=
=20
already runs slower in windows than in linux, and i already tried SuperTux =
in=20
a Celeron and it was a bit slow, so I guess it was because of these two=20
factors.

Ricardo Cruz

Em Ter=E7a, 11 de Maio de 2004 14:46, o Benjamin P. Jung escreveu:
> > I've just give it a try to SuperTux in Windows 98 and it worked very
> > well. I was able to change between OpenGL and SDL, Window and FullScreen
> > for a few times... without probs and pretty fast.
> >
> > The only probs I had was a crash when i double-pressed the icon... I
> > think that was just one of the usualls windows messages to not keep the
> > operating system use boring :)
> > Once when i changed between video modes, the mouse stopped moving... I
> > guess we can attribute this fault to MS as well.
>
> I've been giving the Windows binaries a try under Win2k on my old
> P2-266 Notebook ... installation made no problems.
> To noone's surprise I had a very low framerate
> (~ 12fps) and OpenGL mode made the game drop
> below 3fps -- hmmm: didn't crash the machine so I guess it's working
> as supposed to. I'm not able to report on fullscreen issues since my
> old Thinkpad 770E doesn't support resolutions < 1024x768 ...
> in other words: fullscreen worked quite well: gave me a 640x480
> window with a black border 'round it in less than 5 secs. :-)
>
>
> Benjamin
>
>
=2D-=20
Them as has, gets.

Re: [Super-tux-devel] windows binaries

[C R. <zra...@mi...>]

I'll have to test on a Windows system I have, I have Celeron 2GHz/768MB=20=

RAM/GeForce FX5600 with XP.

Ratchet

On May 11, 2004, at 12:15 PM, Ricardo Cruz wrote:

>
>  The OpenGL fps wouldn't suprise me, in case you don't have an=20
> accelerated
> card or the drivers are not installed...
>  About the software rendering, it is too slow... Well, SuperTux (in my=20=

> P4)
> already runs slower in windows than in linux, and i already tried=20
> SuperTux in
> a Celeron and it was a bit slow, so I guess it was because of these =
two
> factors.
>
> Ricardo Cruz
>
> Em Ter=E7a, 11 de Maio de 2004 14:46, o Benjamin P. Jung escreveu:
>>> I've just give it a try to SuperTux in Windows 98 and it worked very
>>> well. I was able to change between OpenGL and SDL, Window and=20
>>> FullScreen
>>> for a few times... without probs and pretty fast.
>>>
>>> The only probs I had was a crash when i double-pressed the icon... I
>>> think that was just one of the usualls windows messages to not keep=20=

>>> the
>>> operating system use boring :)
>>> Once when i changed between video modes, the mouse stopped moving...=20=

>>> I
>>> guess we can attribute this fault to MS as well.
>>
>> I've been giving the Windows binaries a try under Win2k on my old
>> P2-266 Notebook ... installation made no problems.
>> To noone's surprise I had a very low framerate
>> (~ 12fps) and OpenGL mode made the game drop
>> below 3fps -- hmmm: didn't crash the machine so I guess it's working
>> as supposed to. I'm not able to report on fullscreen issues since my
>> old Thinkpad 770E doesn't support resolutions < 1024x768 ...
>> in other words: fullscreen worked quite well: gave me a 640x480
>> window with a black border 'round it in less than 5 secs. :-)
>>
>>
>> Benjamin
>>
>>
> --=20
> Them as has, gets.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
> Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to
> deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
> http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=3Dosdnemail3
> _______________________________________________
> Super-tux-devel mailing list
> Sup...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/super-tux-devel
>
>
---

Are YOU a Good Person? Go here:=20
http://www.wayofthemaster.com/wotm_flash.html