super-tux-devel

[Super-tux-devel] [fwd] Re: supertux 0.0.9 bug

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

----- Forwarded message from SixK <dasixk (At) free (d0t) fr> -----

I just had a look at CVS,
It seem's anyway that a lot of modifications has been made since version
0.0.9, and my problems have already been corrected (at least the one that
was causing a crash)  

I'll have to check the CVS more often :)

Regards
SixK


----- End forwarded message -----

:)

-bill!
bi...@ne...                           Got kids?  Get Tux Paint! 
http://newbreedsoftware.com/bill/       http://newbreedsoftware.com/tuxpaint/

Re: [Super-tux-devel] [fwd] Re: supertux 0.0.9 bug

[Tobias <tob...@gm...>]

Isn't it funny, that we're still at version 0.0.4/5 ???

Greetz...

Tobias Gläßer (who is preparing something for SuperTux fans)

Am Di, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Bill Kendrick um 20:10:
> ----- Forwarded message from SixK <dasixk (At) free (d0t) fr> -----
> 
> I just had a look at CVS,
> It seem's anyway that a lot of modifications has been made since version
> 0.0.9, and my problems have already been corrected (at least the one that
> was causing a crash)  
> 
> I'll have to check the CVS more often :)
> 
> Regards
> SixK
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> :)
> 
> -bill!
> bi...@ne...                           Got kids?  Get Tux Paint! 
> http://newbreedsoftware.com/bill/       http://newbreedsoftware.com/tuxpaint/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Super-tux-devel mailing list
> Sup...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/super-tux-devel
-- 

Re: [Super-tux-devel] [fwd] Re: supertux 0.0.9 bug

[Tobias <tob...@gm...>]

I just wanted to express, that I don't understand, why this guy thinks
we are already at version 0.0.9? :)

Greetz...

Tobias Gläßer

Am Di, den 23.12.2003 schrieb Bill Kendrick um 20:25:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 02:21:40AM -0500, Tobias Gläßer wrote:
> > Isn't it funny, that we're still at version 0.0.4/5 ???
> 
> I don't like skipping version numbers too often, unless there are BIG
> changes, or it's _very_ close to finished!  Even then, my version numbers
> usually remain pretty low. :)
> 
> 
> I think I need a better scheme...
> 
> -bill!
--