Re: [Super-tux-devel] Next version plans

[Ryan F. <rf...@gm...>]

On Wed, 12 May 2004 19:22:46 +0200, Tobias Gl=E4=DFer <tob...@gm...> wro=
te:

> You have to admit, that this solution is way more inconsistent.
> Remember that 0.1.x is also odd numbered.

Yes, it's inconsistent with the past version numbers.

From your other email:
> > The 0.1.x series is for bugfixing only from now on.
> > The 0.2.x versions will be started now and are equivalent to the 0.0.x
> > series (which means, that new features are a top priority).
> > This efforts will result in the 0.3.x series aka 1.0.x.

I guess the point I'm trying to make is that when you get to 1.0.x the
feature releases will be odd numbered (opposite of the way it is now,
unless I'm missing something). So we should make the change now,
rather than later.

ie,

0.0.x -- feature/development releases
0.1.x -- feature freeze, butfixes only
0.2.x -- feature/development releases
1.0.x -- feature freeze, butfixes only
1.1.x -- feature/development releases

Notice that the y-version (x.y.z) changes from odd to even for feature
freeze releases. Maybe this doesn't matter to you, but I think it's
more confusing in the long run.

> Moreover I don't think discussions about version numbering are very
> helpful to our development.

Last email on the subject :)

--=20
Ryan