Re: [Super-tux-devel] Next version plans

[Tobias <tob...@gm...>]

Am Mi, den 12.05.2004 um 11:10 Uhr -0600 schrieb Ryan Flegel:
> On Wed, 12 May 2004 18:53:07 +0200, Tobias Gläßer <tob...@gm...> wrote:
> 
> > CVS is for all unstability you want. Just because 0.2.x will be a series
> > with added functionality it doesn't mean it will be unstable at all.
> 
> Okay, sounds like your mind is made up, but I'll continue my argument anyway :)
> 
> By "unstable" I don't mean crashing all the time, I mean the way 0.0.5
> and 0.0.6 were just progressions towards 0.1.0. I'm just saying that
> we should make 0.3.x releases the progressions towards 0.4.0.
> 
> In short:
>  - 0.1.2 would be a bugfix release for the 0.1.x series
>  - 0.3.x would be progressions towards 0.4.0 (in the same way 0.0.x
> progressed towards 0.1.0)
>  - 0.4.0 would be Milestone2
>  - 0.2.x would be skipped :)
> 
> -- 
> Ryan

You have to admit, that this solution is way more inconsistent.
Remember that 0.1.x is also odd numbered.

A jump to 0.3.x is neither justified nor does it improve the situation
in any way, because it is even more confusing.

Moreover I don't think discussions about version numbering are very
helpful to our development.

Greetz...

Tobias Gläßer (... notes that Linux had pretty much the same jump in its
infancy)