Re: [Super-tux-devel] Next version plans

[Ryan F. <rf...@gm...>]

On Wed, 12 May 2004 18:29:21 +0200, Tobias Gl=E4=DFer <tob...@gm...> wro=
te:

> Hi,
>=20
> there is no reason to copy the Kernel development concept.
> The SuperTux concept worked well and will continue to work
> well, just because we jump from 0.2.x to 1.0.x or 0.9(beta)
> it doesn't mean that the achievements will be less or the
> time to fullfill the aims will be shorter.

Yes, I know the version numbers are just numbers and don't mean
more/less features. But that's the problem (very small problem,
admittedly :), it would be less confusing this way, IMO. I think it
would be convenient to adopt a versioning system like the linux kernel
uses. It's almost exactly like the one you described, except it's
predetermined that odd numbered branches are the unstable branches.

--=20
Ryan