Re: [Super-tux-devel] Next version plans

[Keir L. <ke...@th...>]

On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 10:09 -0600, Ryan Flegel wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2004 16:12:27 +0100, Ricardo Cruz <ri...@ae...> wrote:
> 
> >  Please, don't compare the Linux development with the SuperTux one.
> 
> 
> I think comparing SuperTux kernel development is a great comparison.
> 
> Kernel: They release a stable version (even-numbered y-versionm, let's
> say 1.0.x) and then make any *necessary* patches/fixes on that branch.
> They then start a new unstable tree (1.1.x) where they add and test
> new features. When the unstable tree becoms stable and has the
> required features they release it as a stable release (1.2.x).
> Development then starts on 1.3.x and only necessary bugfixes are
> applied to 1.2.x.
> 
> SuperTux should work the exact same way. If we release a bugfix
> release for 0.1.1 we don't want it to have all of the buggy code that
> we've been adding for the milestone2 release. For example, a
> half-implemented buttjump is in the code right now. Another thing is
> "what is 0.1.2?" -- is it a bugfix release for 0.1.1 or is it SuperTux
> with the new features added? *We* don't even know yet (ok, we know now
> after tobgle's post).
> 
> >  Besides, now without Ingo, our development speed would drop _a lot_!
> 
> You're right :/ But development speed doesn't really come into it.
have i missed something? what happened to Ingo?

Keir