Re: [Super-tux-devel] [Fwd: Supertux bug: Time runs out at goal]

[Ingo R. <gr...@gm...>]

Tobias Gl=E4=DFer <tob...@gm...> writes:

> What's wrong about having an official release that is communicated
> to all people involved before releasing? Did you ask something?

Yes, multiple times on IRC and in my prerelease reply I also made
clear that 2. May is release day, no matter what.

> You simply fail to have the rights to do such a "release".

Who has then?

> Releasing is the wrong word here anyway, I'd like to call it
> distributing a CVS snapshot.

Its not a snapshot, its Milestone1 as it should be like. You still
fail to point out critical issues that would have needed to be fixed
before the release and that were especially know before the release.

> Your first step was apparently
> a news item on happypenguin, but I use to have the release package
> around for testing on the mailing-list for final error-checking.

Thats what the prerelease was for, all bugs that where found got
fixed.

> A bug fix 0.1.1 release isn't wrong, but a missing leveleditor is
> different from a bug.

The editor didn't get ready in time thats why it got striped, nothing
more, it simply wasn't that important. If you include it in 0.1.1 or
in 0.1.5 or whenever is really pretty much a non issue.

--=20
WWW:      http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/=20
JabberID: gr...@ja...=20
ICQ:      59461927