Re: [Super-tux-devel] TODO 0.0.7

[Christopher A. W. <cr...@li...>]

I just wanted to note how pleased I am with the discussion going on in
this project.  When I first came in, chatting on IRC on that meeting
date, I was a bit worried.  There was a lot of arguing going on.  I'm
seeing more discussion now than I did then, and I think that's a good
thing... and I really want to encourage that.
I'm not very fond of debates... both sides try to fight for one idea and
refuse to look at the side of the other.  Thus, in a debate, you can't
listen to the other side without "losing" or being "wrong."  I don't
think we want that to run in our group, and I'm glad to see that it
isn't happening.  Let's just try to keep it that way.  Let us share not
only our opinions but also our reasoning, and let's try to keep open,
contemplative minds to each others' ideas.  I think the project will
move along much more smoothly this way.

Christopher Allan Webber


|
The bottom line

On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:31, Ricardo Cruz wrote:

> Hi,
>  The foreground is what you are referring, it doesn't interact with the u=
ser,=20
> and i vote for 2/3 layers.
>  The layers are tile-based. Easy to do, small size, fast to blit and flex=
ible.
>=20
> Ricardo Cruz
>=20
> Em Quarta, 17 de Mar=E7o de 2004 21:14, o Michael George escreveu:
> >
> > I like this idea, but would like to add that a fore-fore-ground list is
> > also necessary for some of the desired effects (stuff that isn't
> > interactive, but is painted on top of the active layer).
> >
> > Also, are these layers going to be tile-based, or one big looong png
> > file?  I can certainly see advantages and disadvantages both ways.
> >
> > - --Mike