Re: [Super-tux-devel] --disable-sound and NOSOUND
Brought to you by:
wkendrick
From: Tobias <tob...@gm...> - 2003-12-18 22:24:14
|
Am Do, den 18.12.2003 schrieb Bill Kendrick um 09:34: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:29:04PM -0500, Tobias Gläßer wrote: > > We have following options. > > -Switching from SDL_mixer to sth. that has less dependencies > > I'm not familiar with 'sth'. sth. = something :) > I'm really opposed to switching from SDL_mixer, > though, since it's why I fell in love with SDL in the first place. > It's also VERY popular, well-known, and comes with pretty much all distros. The sound effects in supertux don't sound like they should. When I play them with something like xmms they sound different, so I conclude, that SDL_mixer is at least bad in playing .wav files. You are right. There are SDL_mixer packages for nearly every major distro. > > -Creating fake functions, which do nothing, if someone don't wants to > > link against SDL_mixer. (Just a idea, I dunno if that is 100% possible > > ;) ) > > Defined with #define? ;) Heheheheheh There would be only one remaining #ifndef, which would lead to much cleaner code. > > <snip> > > And in my point of view a runtime option is much better here, since the > > most people will install a RPM or something like that. > > Assumign we find someone who will build RPMs for us at each release ;) > But yeah. I am kind of thinking as though it were still 1998-1999 :) > > > <snip> > > Greetz... (I'm going to view 'Lord of the Rings' today!) > > Cool! I hear they throw the ring into the lava. Heheheh ;) > (It's hard to spoil a movie based on such an old book ;) Heh. Yepp, they actually melt the ring. :) Greetz... Tobias Gläßer |