sunxacml-devl — Discussion list for project developers only

[sunxacml-devl] How to generate the request with <request> tag namespace content

[楊 鈞凱 <wai...@ho...>]

Hello Dear ALL:
I want to generate the xacml request with <request> tag namespace content
for example a request start with <Request xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os"                                          xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"	                                  xsi:schemaLocation="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/access_control-xacml-2.0-context-schema-os.xsd">
I use the SampleRequestBuilder.java in the sample archive to generate the request but I only can generate the blank <request> tag with no namespace content.
So any tips ?
BTW,I'm using Sun XACML Implementation 1.2 edition.
Thanks!!

Kay 		 	   		  

Re: [sunxacml-devl] multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

Perhaps if you would like to create a testNG unti test for this and 
provide a patch we could integrate it into the trunk and plan inclusion 
in the next release.

On 04/21/2011 10:28 PM, hao chen wrote:
> I tried sunxacml-2.0-M1 and got the same problem. I am not sure if 
> sunxacml 2.0 is really implemented as xacml spec v2 says.
> Best Regard
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Farrukh Najmi <fa...@we...>
> *To:* hao chen <d9...@ya...>
> *Cc:* Seth Proctor <st...@al...>; 
> sun...@li...
> *Sent:* Thu, April 21, 2011 4:49:58 PM
> *Subject:* Re: multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation
>
> Hi Hao,
>
> You can get pre-built jar here:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/2.0-M1/sunxacml-2.0-M1.jar/download
>
> If you wish to build from source then you get the sources using hg  
> (mercurial) using the following commands:
>
> hg clone 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/2.0-M1/sunxacml-2.0-M1.jar/download
> hg update
>
> Once you have the source code you can build it using mvn (maven 2) using:
>
> mvn clean
> mvn install
>
> Thats it. Best of luck.
>
> On 04/21/2011 09:02 AM, hao chen wrote:
>> Appreciate anyone can tell me how to get current sunxacml code and 
>> build it in Windows with ibm jre
>> Best Regard
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Seth Proctor <st...@al...>
>> *To:* hao chen <d9...@ya...>
>> *Cc:* sun...@li...
>> *Sent:* Thu, April 21, 2011 7:19:34 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation
>>
>> Please read the web pages for more details. The 1.2 release supports
>> XACML 1.x. The current code supports XACML 2.0 but was never released
>> as a new bundle.
>>
>>
>> seth
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh Najmi
>
> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
>


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh Najmi

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com

Re: [sunxacml-devl] multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation

[hao c. <d9...@ya...>]

I tried sunxacml-2.0-M1 and got the same problem. I am not sure if sunxacml 
2.0 is really implemented as xacml spec v2 says.
 Best Regard 




________________________________
From: Farrukh Najmi <fa...@we...>
To: hao chen <d9...@ya...>
Cc: Seth Proctor <st...@al...>; sun...@li...
Sent: Thu, April 21, 2011 4:49:58 PM
Subject: Re: multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation

Hi Hao,

You can get pre-built jar here:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/2.0-M1/sunxacml-2.0-M1.jar/download


If you wish to build from source then you get the sources using hg  (mercurial) 
using the following commands:

hg clone 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/2.0-M1/sunxacml-2.0-M1.jar/download

hg update

Once you have the source code you can build it using mvn (maven 2) using:

mvn clean
mvn install

Thats it. Best of luck.

On 04/21/2011 09:02 AM, hao chen wrote: 
Appreciate anyone can tell me how to get current sunxacml code and build it in 
Windows with ibm jre
> Best Regard 
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Seth Proctor <st...@al...>
>To: hao chen <d9...@ya...>
>Cc: sun...@li...
>Sent: Thu, April 21, 2011 7:19:34 AM
>Subject: Re: multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation
>
>Please read the web pages for more details. The 1.2 release supports
>XACML 1.x. The current code supports XACML 2.0 but was never released
>as a new bundle.
>
>
>seth
>


--  Regards, Farrukh Najmi  Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com  

Re: [sunxacml-devl] multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

Hi Hao,

You can get pre-built jar here:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/2.0-M1/sunxacml-2.0-M1.jar/download

If you wish to build from source then you get the sources using hg  
(mercurial) using the following commands:

hg clone 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/2.0-M1/sunxacml-2.0-M1.jar/download
hg update

Once you have the source code you can build it using mvn (maven 2) using:

mvn clean
mvn install

Thats it. Best of luck.

On 04/21/2011 09:02 AM, hao chen wrote:
> Appreciate anyone can tell me how to get current sunxacml code and 
> build it in Windows with ibm jre
> Best Regard
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Seth Proctor <st...@al...>
> *To:* hao chen <d9...@ya...>
> *Cc:* sun...@li...
> *Sent:* Thu, April 21, 2011 7:19:34 AM
> *Subject:* Re: multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation
>
> Please read the web pages for more details. The 1.2 release supports
> XACML 1.x. The current code supports XACML 2.0 but was never released
> as a new bundle.
>
>
> seth


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh Najmi

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com

Re: [sunxacml-devl] multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation

[hao c. <d9...@ya...>]

Appreciate anyone can tell me how to get current sunxacml code and build it in 
Windows with ibm jre
 Best Regard 




________________________________
From: Seth Proctor <st...@al...>
To: hao chen <d9...@ya...>
Cc: sun...@li...
Sent: Thu, April 21, 2011 7:19:34 AM
Subject: Re: multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation

Please read the web pages for more details. The 1.2 release supports
XACML 1.x. The current code supports XACML 2.0 but was never released
as a new bundle.


seth

Re: [sunxacml-devl] multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation

[Seth P. <st...@al...>]

Please read the web pages for more details. The 1.2 release supports
XACML 1.x. The current code supports XACML 2.0 but was never released
as a new bundle.


seth

[sunxacml-devl] multi values for resource-id in sunxacml implementation

[hao c. <d9...@ya...>]

Hi,

I am using sun xacml implementaton v1.2 released at 2004-07-16. I tried to put 
multiple values into the resource attribute resource-id in a request. Because 
this implementation does not support bag, I use multiple <Attribute> elements. 
Based on XACML spec v2, section 6.3, it is allowed [The 

2948 
 
I tried the following request:
 <?
<xmlversion="1.0"encoding="UTF-8"?>Requestxmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"xsi:schemaLocation="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:context:schema:os
 access_control-xacml-2.0-context-schema-os.xsd 
"><SubjectSubjectCategory="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject-category:access-subject"><AttributeDataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI"AttributeId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:subject:role"><AttributeValue>Role1</AttributeValue></Attribute></Subject><Resource><AttributeDataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI"AttributeId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:resource:resource-id"><AttributeValue>Value1</AttributeValue></Attribute><AttributeDataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI"AttributeId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:resource:resource-id"><AttributeValue>Value2</AttributeValue></Attribute></Resource><Action><AttributeDataType="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI"AttributeId="urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:action:action-id"><AttributeValue>access</AttributeValue></Attribute></Action></<Environment/>Request>

 I got an error:<Resource> element MAY contain one or more <Attribute> elements 
with anAttributeId of “urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:resource:resource-id”.]
com.sun.xacml.ParsingException
 
 It looks like this implementation still follows XACML spec v1. Is there any 
easy way to quick fix the issue? 
 
Best Regard : too many resource-id attrs

Re: [sunxacml-devl] license of sun xacml implementation

[Seth P. <st...@al...>]

The code uses a BSD license. FYI, all projects on SF need to have
their licenses approved before they can be hosted..


seth

[sunxacml-devl] license of sun xacml implementation

[hao c. <d9...@ya...>]

Hi 

May I ask what license term are applied to sun xacml implementation? Is that 
complied with http://p.sf.net/sourceforge/terms?
 Best Regard 
hao

Re: [sunxacml-devl] public maven repository containing sunxacml-2.0-M1

[Lennart J. <li...@rt...>]

Hi Kaleb,

that's exactly what i had in mind.

1) publish artifacts to htdocs
2) publish assembly (zip-file) to file share

Cheers,
Lennart

Am 08.09.2010 um 20:30 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:

> Lennart,
> 
> That looks quite good to me an it eliminates the need for anybody to choose a specific mirror. I think it is a good move. Thank you for your work on this.
> 
> Is the desired goal to set up the deploy so that you can deploy to both the file shares as well as the maven repository at the same time?
> 
> --Kaleb
> 
> 
> On Saturday, August 07, 2010 03:36:11 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
>> I tried to publish (by calling mvn deploy) some artifacts to sf.net web hosting. It's as easy as setting up a directory in the htdocs directory (called maven) and fixing two lines is the pom (see attached  ).
>> 
>> I compiled a project with the following repository and dependency secions successfully:
>> 
>> <repository>
>> 	<id>sunxacml-snapshots</id>
>> 	<name>sunxacml Repository</name>
>> 	<url>http://sunxacml.sourceforge.net/maven/snapshots/</url>
>> 	<layout>default</layout>
>> 	<snapshots>
>> 		<enabled>true</enabled>
>> 	</snapshots>
>> </repository>
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> <dependency>
>> 	<groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId>
>> 	<artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId>
>> 	<version>2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> </dependency>
>> 
>> For setting up an assembly (read: zip or tar.gz) for sourceforge the maven assembly plugin may come in handy. The maven deploy-single Mojo is a way to publish everything to sf.net.
>> But i don't have time to continue the work on this right now. I have to work on my thesis.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Lennart
>> 
>> P.S.: I did not delete the files i published on the sf.net servers. Someone should delete /home/groups/s/su/sunxacml/htdocs/maven/ if we don't switch to this directory anytime soon.
>> 
>> Am 07.08.2010 um 09:53 schrieb Lennart Jütte:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 06.08.2010 um 22:23 schrieb Farrukh Najmi:
>>> 
>>>> On 08/06/2010 04:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote:
>>>>> Am 06.08.2010 um 22:04 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:15:59 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 08/06/2010 03:07 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 11:47:31 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The big change was on how to reference the m2 repo in other projects as
>>>>>>>>>> you posted below. Thanks very much!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> But Kaleb is right: a project shouldn't reference a mirror directly. Maybe there's a better solution?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Just a couple of days ago I stumbled across a project that was using svn to host their maven repository. They just created a "mavenrepo" directory along side branches and trunk.  Although it seems a bit strange, it is functional.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That would be much worse than referencing a mirror IMHO.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't think it's a good solution either, I just referenced it as an additional option since I hadn't seen anybody reference my original suggestion of using SF's web hosting.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Oh, i didn't even see this suggestion or forgot about it just after reading.
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think we
>>>>>>> could simply use a variable with a default value referencing one mirror
>>>>>>> and anyone can override it to use as a different mirror.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm coming from the point of view of typical developer who only needs a binary.  That developer likely already has a pom to which he just needs to add a dependency (and maybe a repository). In that case, providing a pom with a variable doesn't really help
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is there a reason not to use SF's web hosting to host the maven repository? Using their web hosting you can manage all the uploads with ssh/scp using ssh keys and it acts as a standard web server, which is all that maven needs.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> There is no reason not to use the SF's web hosting to host the maven 
>>>> repository. The reason why I did it the current way was to have the 
>>>> single mvn:deploy take care of the maven repo deployment as well as 
>>>> publishing to the Files area in a single action. Seemed like less 
>>>> headache to me.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'll try to find out if it's possible to deploy to two targets at the same time.
>>> 
>>> Maybe you have read what i've been thinking about:
>>> 1) deploy jars, etc to web hosting
>>> 2) deploy prepackaged zip (with docs) to file hosting. But this should only happen when a new non-SNAPSHOT release is coming out.
>>> 
>>>> If you guys would prefer to use the web hosting than I can support that 
>>>> position. Thanks.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by 
>>> 
>>> Make an app they can't live without
>>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sunxacml-devl mailing list
>>> sun...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl
>> 
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
> 
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________
> sunxacml-devl mailing list
> sun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl

[sunxacml-devl] XACML 3.0 now a committee specification

[Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...>]

I just discovered that XACML-3.0 is now a committee specification. This implies that it can at any point the TC may submit the committee specification for consideration to become a full OASIS standard.

Here the URL to the committee specification:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/xacml/3.0/xacml-3.0-core-spec-cs-01-en.doc

And if you're interested in the approval process, here's a couple of details:

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#standApprovProcess

Regards.
	
-- 
Kaleb Pederson

Blog - http://kalebpederson.com
Twitter - http://twitter.com/kalebpederson

Re: [sunxacml-devl] public maven repository containing sunxacml-2.0-M1

[Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...>]

Lennart,

That looks quite good to me an it eliminates the need for anybody to choose a specific mirror. I think it is a good move. Thank you for your work on this.

Is the desired goal to set up the deploy so that you can deploy to both the file shares as well as the maven repository at the same time?

--Kaleb


On Saturday, August 07, 2010 03:36:11 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
> I tried to publish (by calling mvn deploy) some artifacts to sf.net web hosting. It's as easy as setting up a directory in the htdocs directory (called maven) and fixing two lines is the pom (see attached  ).
> 
> I compiled a project with the following repository and dependency secions successfully:
> 
> <repository>
> 	<id>sunxacml-snapshots</id>
> 	<name>sunxacml Repository</name>
> 	<url>http://sunxacml.sourceforge.net/maven/snapshots/</url>
> 	<layout>default</layout>
> 	<snapshots>
> 		<enabled>true</enabled>
> 	</snapshots>
> </repository>
> 
> ...
> 
> <dependency>
> 	<groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId>
> 	<artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId>
> 	<version>2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
> 
> For setting up an assembly (read: zip or tar.gz) for sourceforge the maven assembly plugin may come in handy. The maven deploy-single Mojo is a way to publish everything to sf.net.
> But i don't have time to continue the work on this right now. I have to work on my thesis.
> 
> Cheers,
> Lennart
> 
> P.S.: I did not delete the files i published on the sf.net servers. Someone should delete /home/groups/s/su/sunxacml/htdocs/maven/ if we don't switch to this directory anytime soon.
> 
> Am 07.08.2010 um 09:53 schrieb Lennart Jütte:
> 
> > 
> > Am 06.08.2010 um 22:23 schrieb Farrukh Najmi:
> > 
> >> On 08/06/2010 04:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote:
> >>> Am 06.08.2010 um 22:04 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:15:59 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On 08/06/2010 03:07 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 11:47:31 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> The big change was on how to reference the m2 repo in other projects as
> >>>>>>>> you posted below. Thanks very much!
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> But Kaleb is right: a project shouldn't reference a mirror directly. Maybe there's a better solution?
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Just a couple of days ago I stumbled across a project that was using svn to host their maven repository. They just created a "mavenrepo" directory along side branches and trunk.  Although it seems a bit strange, it is functional.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>> That would be much worse than referencing a mirror IMHO.
> >>>>> 
> >>>> I don't think it's a good solution either, I just referenced it as an additional option since I hadn't seen anybody reference my original suggestion of using SF's web hosting.
> >>>> 
> >>> Oh, i didn't even see this suggestion or forgot about it just after reading.
> >>> 
> >>> +1!
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> I think we
> >>>>> could simply use a variable with a default value referencing one mirror
> >>>>> and anyone can override it to use as a different mirror.
> >>>>> 
> >>>> I'm coming from the point of view of typical developer who only needs a binary.  That developer likely already has a pom to which he just needs to add a dependency (and maybe a repository). In that case, providing a pom with a variable doesn't really help
> >>>> 
> >>>> Is there a reason not to use SF's web hosting to host the maven repository? Using their web hosting you can manage all the uploads with ssh/scp using ssh keys and it acts as a standard web server, which is all that maven needs.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >> There is no reason not to use the SF's web hosting to host the maven 
> >> repository. The reason why I did it the current way was to have the 
> >> single mvn:deploy take care of the maven repo deployment as well as 
> >> publishing to the Files area in a single action. Seemed like less 
> >> headache to me.
> >> 
> > 
> > I'll try to find out if it's possible to deploy to two targets at the same time.
> > 
> > Maybe you have read what i've been thinking about:
> > 1) deploy jars, etc to web hosting
> > 2) deploy prepackaged zip (with docs) to file hosting. But this should only happen when a new non-SNAPSHOT release is coming out.
> > 
> >> If you guys would prefer to use the web hosting than I can support that 
> >> position. Thanks.
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by 
> > 
> > Make an app they can't live without
> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
> > _______________________________________________
> > sunxacml-devl mailing list
> > sun...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl
> 
> 

[sunxacml-devl] Fwd: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-devl] IMPORTANT merging maven enhancements (trac issue 48)

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users 
worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and 
speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d

[sunxacml-devl] Fwd: Re: [Gwt-openlayers-devl] [JIRA] Created: (OSSRH-709) GWT-OpenLayers (GWT Wrapper for OpenLayers JavaScript Library)

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

FYI... The gwt-open-layers project documentation will be using the maven 
site generator. I think that is a very good choice.

Here is the current site (not so pretty):

http://gwt-openlayers.sourceforge.net/

When the site is update I will send you a link so you can see the 
difference.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [Gwt-openlayers-devl] [JIRA] Created: (OSSRH-709) 
GWT-OpenLayers (GWT Wrapper for OpenLayers JavaScript Library)
Date: 	Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:49:52 +0200
From: 	Edwin Commandeur <com...@gm...>
To: 	Andrew Hughes <ahh...@gm...>
CC: 	gwt...@li...



Hi Andrew,

I have been reading up on the Maven site generator and it's actually
really cool! I like this apt format (almost plain text).

The only things I kinda missed (but not really) were:
- an out-of-the box search function for the documentation
- an option to convert apt files to pdf directly.
(The Doxia convertor can't seem to do it
http://maven.apache.org/doxia/doxia-tools/doxia-converter/index.html)

For GWT-OL I think we could do without these: If the docs are single
page sites then the browser search function suffices (all the better!)
and if we need something like pdf we can do it through an intermediary
format.

By also generating the site with Maven we really use Maven to the
fullest and we wouldn't need an extra dependency on sth like Sphinx,
which requires installing Python, Python's setup tools etc for Windows
users.

The new Maven layout makes it really easy to get started, so I can say
I am really happy with all your work.

Also, I now have Eclipse Helios running with HgEclipse and m2eclipse,
which makes for an excellent dev environment. Just pushed a minor
bugfix for MapImpl :)...

I will start moving the documentation from Trac to the Maven site,
which should be able to replace the goofy site we have now.

Greetings,
Edwin


On 23 August 2010 02:28, Andrew Hughes<ahh...@gm...>  wrote:
>  What do you think about this?
>  http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin/examples/site-deploy-to-sourceforge.net.html
>
>  On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Andrew Hughes<ahh...@gm...>  wrote:
>>
>>  Good News! I have sucessfully deployed a timed snapshot to sonatype...
>>
>>  http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/gwtopenmaps/openlayers/
>>
>>
>>  On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Andrew Hughes<ahh...@gm...>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Howdy,
>>>  Sphinx and the Maven Sites seem to be the same thing (different
>>>  implementation but very much the same). I don't know anything about Sphinx
>>>  so I can't compare the two. I'll have to talk about this with you before the
>>>  0.5 release :)
>>>  Here are some examples of maven sites I found:
>>>  http://ejb3unit.sourceforge.net/
>>>  http://www.hibernatespatial.org/
>>>  http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/
>>>
>>>  If you want to try run the site for the trac_ticket_48 branch just run
>>>  'mvn site' (note that some links will be broken as when it's still awaiting
>>>  deployment all the ./target paths get in the way).
>>>  :)
>>>
>>>  On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Edwin Commandeur
>>>  <com...@gm...>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi Andrew,
>>>>
>>>>  That is great that you already put out a request to make the gwt-ol
>>>>  jar available in the Maven repos!
>>>>
>>>>  Just to make sure you have all the rights for GWT-OL I have given you
>>>>  project admin rights. If you'd rather not have project admin rights
>>>>  then I you have to give me a shout out and I will revert it.
>>>>
>>>>  After you have deprecated the default tip I will pull everything from
>>>>  Hg and start some work on GWT-OL again.
>>>>
>>>>  One thing I would like to do is use Sphinx for documentation and site
>>>>  generation (http://sphinx.pocoo.org/). There are already some other
>>>>  open source geo projects that use Sphinx. The new MapServer site is
>>>>  created with Sphinx for instance (see http://www.mapserver.org/) and
>>>>  GeoServer is also using it (see http://docs.geoserver.org/2.0.1/user/,
>>>>  at the bottom). Sphinx, a tool written in Python, is really easy to
>>>>  setup using easy install, and that even worked flawlessly on my
>>>>  Windows box.
>>>>
>>>>  Yes, Maven can generate a project website, but Sphinx gives far nicer
>>>>  docs out-of-the-box that can be searched as well. What is your take on
>>>>  this?
>>>>
>>>>  Greetings,
>>>>  Edwin
>>>>
>>>>  On 19 August 2010 23:30, Andrew Hughes<ahh...@gm...>  wrote:
>>>>  >  Coming soon.... v0.5 :)
>>>>  >
>>>>  >  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>  >  From: Andrew Hughes (JIRA)<is...@so...>
>>>>  >  Date: Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:42 AM
>>>>  >  Subject: [JIRA] Created: (OSSRH-709) GWT-OpenLayers (GWT Wrapper for
>>>>  >  OpenLayers JavaScript Library)
>>>>  >  To: ahh...@gm...
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >  GWT-OpenLayers (GWT Wrapper for OpenLayers JavaScript Library)
>>>>  >  --------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>  >
>>>>  >                   Key: OSSRH-709
>>>>  >                   URL: http://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-709
>>>>  >               Project: Support - Open Source Project Repository Hosting
>>>>  >            Issue Type: New Project
>>>>  >              Reporter: Andrew Hughes
>>>>  >              Assignee: Juven Xu
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >  Id like to release this project out into central for public
>>>>  >  consumption.
>>>>  >  Cheers.
>>>>  >
>>>>  >  Also, the colleague on the project owns the domain 'gwtopenmaps.org',
>>>>  >  see
>>>>  >  http://openlayers.gwtopenmaps.org/
>>>>  >
>>>>  >  I will try and get this released, signed and pushed up ASAP... I will
>>>>  >  put
>>>>  >  Jira comments on this issue to report progress. Cheers.
>>>>  >
>>>>  >  --
>>>>  >  This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>>  >  -
>>>>  >  If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>>>>  >  administrators:
>>>>  >  http://issues.sonatype.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
>>>>  >  -
>>>>  >  For more information on JIRA, see:
>>>>  >  http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>>  >
>>>
>>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users
worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and
speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
_______________________________________________
Gwt-openlayers-devl mailing list
Gwt...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gwt-openlayers-devl

Re: [sunxacml-devl] public maven repository containing sunxacml-2.0-M1

[Lennart J. <li...@rt...>]

I tried to publish (by calling mvn deploy) some artifacts to sf.net web hosting. It's as easy as setting up a directory in the htdocs directory (called maven) and fixing two lines is the pom (see attached  ).

I compiled a project with the following repository and dependency secions successfully:

<repository>
	<id>sunxacml-snapshots</id>
	<name>sunxacml Repository</name>
	<url>http://sunxacml.sourceforge.net/maven/snapshots/</url>
	<layout>default</layout>
	<snapshots>
		<enabled>true</enabled>
	</snapshots>
</repository>

...

<dependency>
	<groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId>
	<artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId>
	<version>2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>

For setting up an assembly (read: zip or tar.gz) for sourceforge the maven assembly plugin may come in handy. The maven deploy-single Mojo is a way to publish everything to sf.net.
But i don't have time to continue the work on this right now. I have to work on my thesis.

Cheers,
Lennart

P.S.: I did not delete the files i published on the sf.net servers. Someone should delete /home/groups/s/su/sunxacml/htdocs/maven/ if we don't switch to this directory anytime soon.

Am 07.08.2010 um 09:53 schrieb Lennart Jütte:

> 
> Am 06.08.2010 um 22:23 schrieb Farrukh Najmi:
> 
>> On 08/06/2010 04:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote:
>>> Am 06.08.2010 um 22:04 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:15:59 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 08/06/2010 03:07 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 11:47:31 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The big change was on how to reference the m2 repo in other projects as
>>>>>>>> you posted below. Thanks very much!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But Kaleb is right: a project shouldn't reference a mirror directly. Maybe there's a better solution?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just a couple of days ago I stumbled across a project that was using svn to host their maven repository. They just created a "mavenrepo" directory along side branches and trunk.  Although it seems a bit strange, it is functional.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> That would be much worse than referencing a mirror IMHO.
>>>>> 
>>>> I don't think it's a good solution either, I just referenced it as an additional option since I hadn't seen anybody reference my original suggestion of using SF's web hosting.
>>>> 
>>> Oh, i didn't even see this suggestion or forgot about it just after reading.
>>> 
>>> +1!
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> I think we
>>>>> could simply use a variable with a default value referencing one mirror
>>>>> and anyone can override it to use as a different mirror.
>>>>> 
>>>> I'm coming from the point of view of typical developer who only needs a binary.  That developer likely already has a pom to which he just needs to add a dependency (and maybe a repository). In that case, providing a pom with a variable doesn't really help
>>>> 
>>>> Is there a reason not to use SF's web hosting to host the maven repository? Using their web hosting you can manage all the uploads with ssh/scp using ssh keys and it acts as a standard web server, which is all that maven needs.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> There is no reason not to use the SF's web hosting to host the maven 
>> repository. The reason why I did it the current way was to have the 
>> single mvn:deploy take care of the maven repo deployment as well as 
>> publishing to the Files area in a single action. Seemed like less 
>> headache to me.
>> 
> 
> I'll try to find out if it's possible to deploy to two targets at the same time.
> 
> Maybe you have read what i've been thinking about:
> 1) deploy jars, etc to web hosting
> 2) deploy prepackaged zip (with docs) to file hosting. But this should only happen when a new non-SNAPSHOT release is coming out.
> 
>> If you guys would prefer to use the web hosting than I can support that 
>> position. Thanks.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>> Farrukh
>> 
>> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by 
>> 
>> Make an app they can't live without
>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sunxacml-devl mailing list
>> sun...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by 
> 
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> sunxacml-devl mailing list
> sun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl

Re: [sunxacml-devl] public maven repository containing sunxacml-2.0-M1

[Lennart J. <li...@rt...>]

Am 06.08.2010 um 22:23 schrieb Farrukh Najmi:

> On 08/06/2010 04:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote:
>> Am 06.08.2010 um 22:04 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:15:59 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 08/06/2010 03:07 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 11:47:31 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The big change was on how to reference the m2 repo in other projects as
>>>>>>> you posted below. Thanks very much!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But Kaleb is right: a project shouldn't reference a mirror directly. Maybe there's a better solution?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Just a couple of days ago I stumbled across a project that was using svn to host their maven repository. They just created a "mavenrepo" directory along side branches and trunk.  Although it seems a bit strange, it is functional.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> That would be much worse than referencing a mirror IMHO.
>>>> 
>>> I don't think it's a good solution either, I just referenced it as an additional option since I hadn't seen anybody reference my original suggestion of using SF's web hosting.
>>> 
>> Oh, i didn't even see this suggestion or forgot about it just after reading.
>> 
>> +1!
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> I think we
>>>> could simply use a variable with a default value referencing one mirror
>>>> and anyone can override it to use as a different mirror.
>>>> 
>>> I'm coming from the point of view of typical developer who only needs a binary.  That developer likely already has a pom to which he just needs to add a dependency (and maybe a repository). In that case, providing a pom with a variable doesn't really help
>>> 
>>> Is there a reason not to use SF's web hosting to host the maven repository? Using their web hosting you can manage all the uploads with ssh/scp using ssh keys and it acts as a standard web server, which is all that maven needs.
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> There is no reason not to use the SF's web hosting to host the maven 
> repository. The reason why I did it the current way was to have the 
> single mvn:deploy take care of the maven repo deployment as well as 
> publishing to the Files area in a single action. Seemed like less 
> headache to me.
> 

I'll try to find out if it's possible to deploy to two targets at the same time.

Maybe you have read what i've been thinking about:
1) deploy jars, etc to web hosting
2) deploy prepackaged zip (with docs) to file hosting. But this should only happen when a new non-SNAPSHOT release is coming out.

> If you guys would prefer to use the web hosting than I can support that 
> position. Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by 
> 
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> sunxacml-devl mailing list
> sun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl

Re: [sunxacml-devl] public maven repository containing sunxacml-2.0-M1

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

On 08/06/2010 04:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote:
> Am 06.08.2010 um 22:04 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:
>
>    
>> On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:15:59 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>      
>>> On 08/06/2010 03:07 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
>>>        
>>>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 11:47:31 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>>> The big change was on how to reference the m2 repo in other projects as
>>>>>> you posted below. Thanks very much!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>> But Kaleb is right: a project shouldn't reference a mirror directly. Maybe there's a better solution?
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> Just a couple of days ago I stumbled across a project that was using svn to host their maven repository. They just created a "mavenrepo" directory along side branches and trunk.  Although it seems a bit strange, it is functional.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> That would be much worse than referencing a mirror IMHO.
>>>        
>> I don't think it's a good solution either, I just referenced it as an additional option since I hadn't seen anybody reference my original suggestion of using SF's web hosting.
>>      
> Oh, i didn't even see this suggestion or forgot about it just after reading.
>
> +1!
>
>    
>>      
>>> I think we
>>> could simply use a variable with a default value referencing one mirror
>>> and anyone can override it to use as a different mirror.
>>>        
>> I'm coming from the point of view of typical developer who only needs a binary.  That developer likely already has a pom to which he just needs to add a dependency (and maybe a repository). In that case, providing a pom with a variable doesn't really help
>>
>> Is there a reason not to use SF's web hosting to host the maven repository? Using their web hosting you can manage all the uploads with ssh/scp using ssh keys and it acts as a standard web server, which is all that maven needs.
>>
>>      

There is no reason not to use the SF's web hosting to host the maven 
repository. The reason why I did it the current way was to have the 
single mvn:deploy take care of the maven repo deployment as well as 
publishing to the Files area in a single action. Seemed like less 
headache to me.

If you guys would prefer to use the web hosting than I can support that 
position. Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com

Re: [sunxacml-devl] public maven repository containing sunxacml-2.0-M1

[Lennart J. <li...@rt...>]

Am 06.08.2010 um 22:04 schrieb Kaleb Pederson:

> On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:15:59 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>> On 08/06/2010 03:07 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
>>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 11:47:31 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> The big change was on how to reference the m2 repo in other projects as
>>>>> you posted below. Thanks very much!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> But Kaleb is right: a project shouldn't reference a mirror directly. Maybe there's a better solution?
>>>> 
>>> Just a couple of days ago I stumbled across a project that was using svn to host their maven repository. They just created a "mavenrepo" directory along side branches and trunk.  Although it seems a bit strange, it is functional.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> That would be much worse than referencing a mirror IMHO.
> 
> I don't think it's a good solution either, I just referenced it as an additional option since I hadn't seen anybody reference my original suggestion of using SF's web hosting.

Oh, i didn't even see this suggestion or forgot about it just after reading.

+1!

> 
>> I think we 
>> could simply use a variable with a default value referencing one mirror 
>> and anyone can override it to use as a different mirror.
> 
> I'm coming from the point of view of typical developer who only needs a binary.  That developer likely already has a pom to which he just needs to add a dependency (and maybe a repository). In that case, providing a pom with a variable doesn't really help
> 
> Is there a reason not to use SF's web hosting to host the maven repository? Using their web hosting you can manage all the uploads with ssh/scp using ssh keys and it acts as a standard web server, which is all that maven needs.
> 
> --Kaleb
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by 
> 
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> sunxacml-devl mailing list
> sun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl

Re: [sunxacml-devl] public maven repository containing sunxacml-2.0-M1

[Lennart J. <li...@rt...>]

Or we publish to the "normal" webspace on SF.net (just like the docs/site).
The maven repo doesn't need the fancy SF.net file browser and a lot of mirrors.

We could set up a maven target that compiles a zip file containing all required files (minus all the maven management stuff, checksums, pom, etc) for everyone who does not want to use maven. This archive would be published just like the maven files now (http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/)



Am 06.08.2010 um 21:15 schrieb Farrukh Najmi:

> On 08/06/2010 03:07 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 11:47:31 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
>> 
>>>> The big change was on how to reference the m2 repo in other projects as
>>>> you posted below. Thanks very much!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> But Kaleb is right: a project shouldn't reference a mirror directly. Maybe there's a better solution?
>>> 
>> Just a couple of days ago I stumbled across a project that was using svn to host their maven repository. They just created a "mavenrepo" directory along side branches and trunk.  Although it seems a bit strange, it is functional.
>> 
>> 
> 
> That would be much worse than referencing a mirror IMHO. I think we 
> could simply use a variable with a default value referencing one mirror 
> and anyone can override it to use as a different mirror.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by 
> 
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
> _______________________________________________
> sunxacml-devl mailing list
> sun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl

Re: [sunxacml-devl] SAML 2.0 profile

[Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...>]

On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:52:12 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 03:46 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> > On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:19:19 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> >    
> >> Changing subject to be more apropriate for this sub-thread.
> >>
> >> On 08/06/2010 03:17 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> >>      
> >>> Hi Kaleb,
> >>>
> >>> Would you be willing to do the patch for adding support for the SAML 2.0
> >>> profile?
> >>> I would be willing to review it.
> >>>        
> > Yes, I'd be glad to do that.
> >
> >    
> >>> If so, here is a document I wrote for another SF project that describes
> >>> the process. It should be mostly applicable.
> >>>
> >>> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/3.0/PatchSubmissionGuide.html
> >>>        
> > Seems reasonable. Do you really want a patch or can I generate a bundle from a branch in hg?
> >
> >    
> 
> Good point. I guess I still think in old svn ways. How about you clone 
> the master repo into a local repo make changes and commit to local repo 
> and then you send us the link to repo and version in it. Thanks.

Will do.

--Kaleb

Re: [sunxacml-devl] public maven repository containing sunxacml-2.0-M1

[Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...>]

On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:15:59 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 03:07 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> > On Friday, July 30, 2010 11:47:31 am Lennart Jütte wrote:
> >    
> >>> The big change was on how to reference the m2 repo in other projects as
> >>> you posted below. Thanks very much!
> >>>
> >>>        
> >> But Kaleb is right: a project shouldn't reference a mirror directly. Maybe there's a better solution?
> >>      
> > Just a couple of days ago I stumbled across a project that was using svn to host their maven repository. They just created a "mavenrepo" directory along side branches and trunk.  Although it seems a bit strange, it is functional.
> >
> >    
> 
> That would be much worse than referencing a mirror IMHO.

I don't think it's a good solution either, I just referenced it as an additional option since I hadn't seen anybody reference my original suggestion of using SF's web hosting.

> I think we 
> could simply use a variable with a default value referencing one mirror 
> and anyone can override it to use as a different mirror.

I'm coming from the point of view of typical developer who only needs a binary.  That developer likely already has a pom to which he just needs to add a dependency (and maybe a repository). In that case, providing a pom with a variable doesn't really help

Is there a reason not to use SF's web hosting to host the maven repository? Using their web hosting you can manage all the uploads with ssh/scp using ssh keys and it acts as a standard web server, which is all that maven needs.

--Kaleb

Re: [sunxacml-devl] SAML 2.0 profile

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

On 08/06/2010 03:46 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:19:19 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>    
>> Changing subject to be more apropriate for this sub-thread.
>>
>> On 08/06/2010 03:17 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>      
>>> Hi Kaleb,
>>>
>>> Would you be willing to do the patch for adding support for the SAML 2.0
>>> profile?
>>> I would be willing to review it.
>>>        
> Yes, I'd be glad to do that.
>
>    
>>> If so, here is a document I wrote for another SF project that describes
>>> the process. It should be mostly applicable.
>>>
>>> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/3.0/PatchSubmissionGuide.html
>>>        
> Seems reasonable. Do you really want a patch or can I generate a bundle from a branch in hg?
>
>    

Good point. I guess I still think in old svn ways. How about you clone 
the master repo into a local repo make changes and commit to local repo 
and then you send us the link to repo and version in it. Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com

Re: [sunxacml-devl] SAML 2.0 profile

[Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...>]

On Friday, August 06, 2010 12:19:19 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> 
> Changing subject to be more apropriate for this sub-thread.
> 
> On 08/06/2010 03:17 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> > Hi Kaleb,
> >
> > Would you be willing to do the patch for adding support for the SAML 2.0
> > profile?
> > I would be willing to review it.

Yes, I'd be glad to do that.

> > If so, here is a document I wrote for another SF project that describes
> > the process. It should be mostly applicable.
> >
> > http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/3.0/PatchSubmissionGuide.html

Seems reasonable. Do you really want a patch or can I generate a bundle from a branch in hg?

--Kaleb

> > Thanks.
> >
> > On 08/06/2010 03:01 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> >    
> >> I'm not yet sure if I will need that profile but I will need support for the "SAML 2.0 Profile of XACML 2.0".
> >>
> >> The schema for the SAML profile is in the repository but a quick grep through the code doesn't seem to indicate there's any support for that profile either.  I think supporting it only requires some enhancements to the PDP.
> >>
> >> --Kaleb
> >>
> >> On Friday, August 06, 2010 11:28:27 am Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> >>
> >>      
> >>> Quick search suggests that we do not. Is any one else besides me in need
> >>> of it?
> >>>
> >>> On 08/06/2010 02:24 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> >>>
> >>>        
> >>>> Does any one know if we support this spec?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>

[sunxacml-devl] SAML 2.0 profile

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

Changing subject to be more apropriate for this sub-thread.

On 08/06/2010 03:17 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> Hi Kaleb,
>
> Would you be willing to do the patch for adding support for the SAML 2.0
> profile?
> I would be willing to review it.
>
> If so, here is a document I wrote for another SF project that describes
> the process. It should be mostly applicable.
>
> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/3.0/PatchSubmissionGuide.html
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 08/06/2010 03:01 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
>    
>> I'm not yet sure if I will need that profile but I will need support for the "SAML 2.0 Profile of XACML 2.0".
>>
>> The schema for the SAML profile is in the repository but a quick grep through the code doesn't seem to indicate there's any support for that profile either.  I think supporting it only requires some enhancements to the PDP.
>>
>> --Kaleb
>>
>> On Friday, August 06, 2010 11:28:27 am Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> Quick search suggests that we do not. Is any one else besides me in need
>>> of it?
>>>
>>> On 08/06/2010 02:24 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Does any one know if we support this spec?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>>
>> Make an app they can't live without
>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> sunxacml-devl mailing list
>> sun...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl
>>
>>
>>      
>
>    


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com

Re: [sunxacml-devl] Doe we support Hierarchical Resources Profile for XACML?

[Farrukh N. <fa...@we...>]

Hi Kaleb,

Would you be willing to do the patch for adding support for the SAML 2.0 
profile?
I would be willing to review it.

If so, here is a document I wrote for another SF project that describes 
the process. It should be mostly applicable.

http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/3.0/PatchSubmissionGuide.html

Thanks.

On 08/06/2010 03:01 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> I'm not yet sure if I will need that profile but I will need support for the "SAML 2.0 Profile of XACML 2.0".
>
> The schema for the SAML profile is in the repository but a quick grep through the code doesn't seem to indicate there's any support for that profile either.  I think supporting it only requires some enhancements to the PDP.
>
> --Kaleb
>
> On Friday, August 06, 2010 11:28:27 am Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>    
>> Quick search suggests that we do not. Is any one else besides me in need
>> of it?
>>
>> On 08/06/2010 02:24 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>      
>>> Does any one know if we support this spec?
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>
>>
>>      
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> sunxacml-devl mailing list
> sun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl
>
>    


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com