sunxacml-devl Mailing List for Sun's XACML Implementation (Page 3)
Brought to you by:
farrukh_najmi,
sethp
Menu
▾
▴
sunxacml-devl — Discussion list for project developers only
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(38) |
May
(158) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(8) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-30 18:38:18
|
Hi Lennart, Many thanks! Can you explain what you did to publish the M1 artifacts to the repo. Was it simply doing an "mvn deploy" with same pom as we had for M1? Thanks again. On 07/30/2010 02:35 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: > ok, done. > > sunxacml-2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT.jar should be released by now. > > > Am 30.07.2010 um 20:01 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > > >> mvn deploy should be good. But I thought I had already deployed it based on current pom.xml repo location. Does the pom.xml need to be changed? >> >> On 07/30/2010 01:45 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >> >>> Hi Farrukh, >>> >>> I'm finishing up my thesis right now but pushing some artifacts should be possible. Is there anything i have to watch out for, or is it ok to just run mvn deploy? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lennart >>> >>> Am 30.07.2010 um 19:05 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi Lennart, >>>> >>>> I believe you are authorized to publish files to the project. I would be grateful if you can go ahead and do this as I am facing a deadline at the moment. Thanks. >>>> >>>> On 07/29/2010 03:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> IIRC we had a short discussion about this before. Or I talked to someone else about this. Whatever: Here is a code snipplet from a project's pom.xml, that has sunxacml as dependency: >>>>> >>>>> <repositories> >>>>> <repository> >>>>> <id>sunxacml-snapshots</id> >>>>> <name>sunxacml Repository</name> >>>>> <!-- (1) --> >>>>> <url>http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/</url> >>>>> <layout>default</layout> >>>>> <snapshots> >>>>> <enabled>true</enabled> >>>>> </snapshots> >>>>> </repository> >>>>> </repositories> >>>>> >>>>> <dependencies> >>>>> <dependency> >>>>> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >>>>> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >>>>> <!-- (2) --> >>>>> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>>>> </dependency> >>>>> <dependency> >>>>> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >>>>> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >>>>> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>>>> <classifier>tests</classifier> >>>>> <scope>test</scope> >>>>> </dependency> >>>>> <dependency> >>>>> <dependencies> >>>>> >>>>> Please note: >>>>> (1) use the URL of a real sf.net mirror, not the sf.net URL itself. Open >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>>>> and then >>>>> http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/ >>>>> >>>>> The first page shows you a SF.net file listing. Clicking on any file leads to a mirror selection screen. The second link links to the right directory directly. >>>>> >>>>> (2) Farrukh: Can you publish the artifacts for 2.0-M1? Or am i allowed to do this? Is there some documentation about publishing/pushing artifacts? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Lennart >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 22.07.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Kaleb, >>>>>> >>>>>> We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the >>>>>> sunxacml project. See the tree at: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>>>>> >>>>>> But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be >>>>>> done is probably quite simple. >>>>>> I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to >>>>>> set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump >>>>>> on this issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most >>>>>>> recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything >>>>>>> that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor >>>>>>> mvnbrowser.com. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been using the following JBoss repository: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <repository> >>>>>>> <id>jboss</id> >>>>>>> <name>jboss-repository</name> >>>>>>> <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> >>>>>>> <releases></releases> >>>>>>> </repository> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the >>>>>>> JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> >>>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> >>>>>>> <version>2.0.4</version> >>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, >>>>>>> and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Kaleb >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything >>>>>>> other than spam there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Farrukh Najmi >>>> >>>> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Farrukh Najmi >> >> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >> >> >> >> > > -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-30 18:35:27
|
ok, done. sunxacml-2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT.jar should be released by now. Am 30.07.2010 um 20:01 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > mvn deploy should be good. But I thought I had already deployed it based on current pom.xml repo location. Does the pom.xml need to be changed? > > On 07/30/2010 01:45 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >> Hi Farrukh, >> >> I'm finishing up my thesis right now but pushing some artifacts should be possible. Is there anything i have to watch out for, or is it ok to just run mvn deploy? >> >> Cheers, >> Lennart >> >> Am 30.07.2010 um 19:05 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >> >> >>> Hi Lennart, >>> >>> I believe you are authorized to publish files to the project. I would be grateful if you can go ahead and do this as I am facing a deadline at the moment. Thanks. >>> >>> On 07/29/2010 03:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>> >>>> IIRC we had a short discussion about this before. Or I talked to someone else about this. Whatever: Here is a code snipplet from a project's pom.xml, that has sunxacml as dependency: >>>> >>>> <repositories> >>>> <repository> >>>> <id>sunxacml-snapshots</id> >>>> <name>sunxacml Repository</name> >>>> <!-- (1) --> >>>> <url>http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/</url> >>>> <layout>default</layout> >>>> <snapshots> >>>> <enabled>true</enabled> >>>> </snapshots> >>>> </repository> >>>> </repositories> >>>> >>>> <dependencies> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >>>> <!-- (2) --> >>>> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >>>> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>>> <classifier>tests</classifier> >>>> <scope>test</scope> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <dependencies> >>>> >>>> Please note: >>>> (1) use the URL of a real sf.net mirror, not the sf.net URL itself. Open >>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>>> and then >>>> http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/ >>>> >>>> The first page shows you a SF.net file listing. Clicking on any file leads to a mirror selection screen. The second link links to the right directory directly. >>>> >>>> (2) Farrukh: Can you publish the artifacts for 2.0-M1? Or am i allowed to do this? Is there some documentation about publishing/pushing artifacts? >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lennart >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 22.07.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Kaleb, >>>>> >>>>> We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the >>>>> sunxacml project. See the tree at: >>>>> >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>>>> >>>>> But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be >>>>> done is probably quite simple. >>>>> I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to >>>>> set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump >>>>> on this issue? >>>>> >>>>> On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most >>>>>> recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything >>>>>> that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor >>>>>> mvnbrowser.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've been using the following JBoss repository: >>>>>> >>>>>> <repository> >>>>>> <id>jboss</id> >>>>>> <name>jboss-repository</name> >>>>>> <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> >>>>>> <releases></releases> >>>>>> </repository> >>>>>> >>>>>> Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the >>>>>> JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: >>>>>> >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> >>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>2.0.4</version> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, >>>>>> and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> --Kaleb >>>>>> >>>>>> PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything >>>>>> other than spam there. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Farrukh Najmi >>> >>> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh Najmi > > Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com > > > |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-30 18:16:53
|
Everyone should add this to his/her <server> section in settings.xml : <filePermissions>664</filePermissions> <directoryPermissions>775</directoryPermissions> Cheers, Lennart Am 30.07.2010 um 20:01 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > mvn deploy should be good. But I thought I had already deployed it based on current pom.xml repo location. Does the pom.xml need to be changed? > > On 07/30/2010 01:45 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >> Hi Farrukh, >> >> I'm finishing up my thesis right now but pushing some artifacts should be possible. Is there anything i have to watch out for, or is it ok to just run mvn deploy? >> >> Cheers, >> Lennart >> >> Am 30.07.2010 um 19:05 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >> >> >>> Hi Lennart, >>> >>> I believe you are authorized to publish files to the project. I would be grateful if you can go ahead and do this as I am facing a deadline at the moment. Thanks. >>> >>> On 07/29/2010 03:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>> >>>> IIRC we had a short discussion about this before. Or I talked to someone else about this. Whatever: Here is a code snipplet from a project's pom.xml, that has sunxacml as dependency: >>>> >>>> <repositories> >>>> <repository> >>>> <id>sunxacml-snapshots</id> >>>> <name>sunxacml Repository</name> >>>> <!-- (1) --> >>>> <url>http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/</url> >>>> <layout>default</layout> >>>> <snapshots> >>>> <enabled>true</enabled> >>>> </snapshots> >>>> </repository> >>>> </repositories> >>>> >>>> <dependencies> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >>>> <!-- (2) --> >>>> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >>>> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>>> <classifier>tests</classifier> >>>> <scope>test</scope> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <dependencies> >>>> >>>> Please note: >>>> (1) use the URL of a real sf.net mirror, not the sf.net URL itself. Open >>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>>> and then >>>> http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/ >>>> >>>> The first page shows you a SF.net file listing. Clicking on any file leads to a mirror selection screen. The second link links to the right directory directly. >>>> >>>> (2) Farrukh: Can you publish the artifacts for 2.0-M1? Or am i allowed to do this? Is there some documentation about publishing/pushing artifacts? >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lennart >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 22.07.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Kaleb, >>>>> >>>>> We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the >>>>> sunxacml project. See the tree at: >>>>> >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>>>> >>>>> But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be >>>>> done is probably quite simple. >>>>> I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to >>>>> set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump >>>>> on this issue? >>>>> >>>>> On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most >>>>>> recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything >>>>>> that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor >>>>>> mvnbrowser.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've been using the following JBoss repository: >>>>>> >>>>>> <repository> >>>>>> <id>jboss</id> >>>>>> <name>jboss-repository</name> >>>>>> <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> >>>>>> <releases></releases> >>>>>> </repository> >>>>>> >>>>>> Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the >>>>>> JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: >>>>>> >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> >>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>2.0.4</version> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, >>>>>> and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> --Kaleb >>>>>> >>>>>> PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything >>>>>> other than spam there. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Farrukh Najmi >>> >>> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh Najmi > > Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com > > > |
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-30 18:06:29
|
Hi Lennart, I believe you are authorized to publish files to the project. I would be grateful if you can go ahead and do this as I am facing a deadline at the moment. Thanks. On 07/29/2010 03:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: > IIRC we had a short discussion about this before. Or I talked to someone else about this. Whatever: Here is a code snipplet from a project's pom.xml, that has sunxacml as dependency: > > <repositories> > <repository> > <id>sunxacml-snapshots</id> > <name>sunxacml Repository</name> > <!-- (1) --> > <url>http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/</url> > <layout>default</layout> > <snapshots> > <enabled>true</enabled> > </snapshots> > </repository> > </repositories> > > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> > <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> > <!-- (2) --> > <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> > <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> > <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > <classifier>tests</classifier> > <scope>test</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <dependencies> > > Please note: > (1) use the URL of a real sf.net mirror, not the sf.net URL itself. Open > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ > and then > http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/ > > The first page shows you a SF.net file listing. Clicking on any file leads to a mirror selection screen. The second link links to the right directory directly. > > (2) Farrukh: Can you publish the artifacts for 2.0-M1? Or am i allowed to do this? Is there some documentation about publishing/pushing artifacts? > > > Cheers, > Lennart > > > Am 22.07.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > > >> Hi Kaleb, >> >> We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the >> sunxacml project. See the tree at: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >> >> But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be >> done is probably quite simple. >> I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to >> set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump >> on this issue? >> >> On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: >> >>> Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most >>> recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything >>> that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor >>> mvnbrowser.com. >>> >>> I've been using the following JBoss repository: >>> >>> <repository> >>> <id>jboss</id> >>> <name>jboss-repository</name> >>> <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> >>> <releases></releases> >>> </repository> >>> >>> Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the >>> JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: >>> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> >>> <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> >>> <version>2.0.4</version> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, >>> and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> --Kaleb >>> >>> PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything >>> other than spam there. >>> >>> >>> >> -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-30 18:02:22
|
mvn deploy should be good. But I thought I had already deployed it based on current pom.xml repo location. Does the pom.xml need to be changed? On 07/30/2010 01:45 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: > Hi Farrukh, > > I'm finishing up my thesis right now but pushing some artifacts should be possible. Is there anything i have to watch out for, or is it ok to just run mvn deploy? > > Cheers, > Lennart > > Am 30.07.2010 um 19:05 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > > >> Hi Lennart, >> >> I believe you are authorized to publish files to the project. I would be grateful if you can go ahead and do this as I am facing a deadline at the moment. Thanks. >> >> On 07/29/2010 03:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >> >>> IIRC we had a short discussion about this before. Or I talked to someone else about this. Whatever: Here is a code snipplet from a project's pom.xml, that has sunxacml as dependency: >>> >>> <repositories> >>> <repository> >>> <id>sunxacml-snapshots</id> >>> <name>sunxacml Repository</name> >>> <!-- (1) --> >>> <url>http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/</url> >>> <layout>default</layout> >>> <snapshots> >>> <enabled>true</enabled> >>> </snapshots> >>> </repository> >>> </repositories> >>> >>> <dependencies> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >>> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >>> <!-- (2) --> >>> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>> </dependency> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >>> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >>> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>> <classifier>tests</classifier> >>> <scope>test</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> <dependency> >>> <dependencies> >>> >>> Please note: >>> (1) use the URL of a real sf.net mirror, not the sf.net URL itself. Open >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>> and then >>> http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/ >>> >>> The first page shows you a SF.net file listing. Clicking on any file leads to a mirror selection screen. The second link links to the right directory directly. >>> >>> (2) Farrukh: Can you publish the artifacts for 2.0-M1? Or am i allowed to do this? Is there some documentation about publishing/pushing artifacts? >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lennart >>> >>> >>> Am 22.07.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi Kaleb, >>>> >>>> We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the >>>> sunxacml project. See the tree at: >>>> >>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>>> >>>> But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be >>>> done is probably quite simple. >>>> I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to >>>> set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump >>>> on this issue? >>>> >>>> On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most >>>>> recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything >>>>> that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor >>>>> mvnbrowser.com. >>>>> >>>>> I've been using the following JBoss repository: >>>>> >>>>> <repository> >>>>> <id>jboss</id> >>>>> <name>jboss-repository</name> >>>>> <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> >>>>> <releases></releases> >>>>> </repository> >>>>> >>>>> Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the >>>>> JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: >>>>> >>>>> <dependency> >>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> >>>>> <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> >>>>> <version>2.0.4</version> >>>>> </dependency> >>>>> >>>>> I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, >>>>> and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> --Kaleb >>>>> >>>>> PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything >>>>> other than spam there. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> -- >> Regards, >> Farrukh Najmi >> >> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >> >> >> >> > > -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-30 17:46:06
|
Hi Farrukh, I'm finishing up my thesis right now but pushing some artifacts should be possible. Is there anything i have to watch out for, or is it ok to just run mvn deploy? Cheers, Lennart Am 30.07.2010 um 19:05 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > > Hi Lennart, > > I believe you are authorized to publish files to the project. I would be grateful if you can go ahead and do this as I am facing a deadline at the moment. Thanks. > > On 07/29/2010 03:09 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >> IIRC we had a short discussion about this before. Or I talked to someone else about this. Whatever: Here is a code snipplet from a project's pom.xml, that has sunxacml as dependency: >> >> <repositories> >> <repository> >> <id>sunxacml-snapshots</id> >> <name>sunxacml Repository</name> >> <!-- (1) --> >> <url>http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/</url> >> <layout>default</layout> >> <snapshots> >> <enabled>true</enabled> >> </snapshots> >> </repository> >> </repositories> >> >> <dependencies> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >> <!-- (2) --> >> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> >> <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> >> <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >> <classifier>tests</classifier> >> <scope>test</scope> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <dependencies> >> >> Please note: >> (1) use the URL of a real sf.net mirror, not the sf.net URL itself. Open >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >> and then >> http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/ >> >> The first page shows you a SF.net file listing. Clicking on any file leads to a mirror selection screen. The second link links to the right directory directly. >> >> (2) Farrukh: Can you publish the artifacts for 2.0-M1? Or am i allowed to do this? Is there some documentation about publishing/pushing artifacts? >> >> >> Cheers, >> Lennart >> >> >> Am 22.07.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >> >> >>> Hi Kaleb, >>> >>> We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the >>> sunxacml project. See the tree at: >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ >>> >>> But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be >>> done is probably quite simple. >>> I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to >>> set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump >>> on this issue? >>> >>> On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: >>> >>>> Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most >>>> recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything >>>> that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor >>>> mvnbrowser.com. >>>> >>>> I've been using the following JBoss repository: >>>> >>>> <repository> >>>> <id>jboss</id> >>>> <name>jboss-repository</name> >>>> <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> >>>> <releases></releases> >>>> </repository> >>>> >>>> Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the >>>> JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: >>>> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> >>>> <version>2.0.4</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> >>>> I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, >>>> and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> --Kaleb >>>> >>>> PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything >>>> other than spam there. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh Najmi > > Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com > > > |
|
From: Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...> - 2010-07-29 21:26:34
|
Lennart, Thank you for the information. That makes sense since you are using the SF files hosting -- the mirrors behave differently. It also sounds like it's adding additional requirements to what's typically an easy process -- the requirement to pick a mirror (and hope that they stay an SF mirror). There are benefits as well, in that you get load balancing, redundancy, and a fairly easy-to-use web interface for managing the files for free. IMO, it would be better to use SF's web hosting and upload to the web server, making the files directly accessible. You won't get the load balancing and redundancy, but it would then be easy to document exactly where the maven repository is, as well as to manage its associated files. --Kaleb On Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:09:04 pm Lennart Jütte wrote: > IIRC we had a short discussion about this before. Or I talked to someone else about this. Whatever: Here is a code snipplet from a project's pom.xml, that has sunxacml as dependency: > > <repositories> > <repository> > <id>sunxacml-snapshots</id> > <name>sunxacml Repository</name> > <!-- (1) --> > <url>http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/</url> > <layout>default</layout> > <snapshots> > <enabled>true</enabled> > </snapshots> > </repository> > </repositories> > > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> > <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> > <!-- (2) --> > <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId> > <artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId> > <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version> > <classifier>tests</classifier> > <scope>test</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <dependencies> > > Please note: > (1) use the URL of a real sf.net mirror, not the sf.net URL itself. Open > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ > and then > http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/ > > The first page shows you a SF.net file listing. Clicking on any file leads to a mirror selection screen. The second link links to the right directory directly. > > (2) Farrukh: Can you publish the artifacts for 2.0-M1? Or am i allowed to do this? Is there some documentation about publishing/pushing artifacts? > > > Cheers, > Lennart > |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-29 19:46:14
|
IIRC we had a short discussion about this before. Or I talked to someone else about this. Whatever: Here is a code snipplet from a project's pom.xml, that has sunxacml as dependency:
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>sunxacml-snapshots</id>
<name>sunxacml Repository</name>
<!-- (1) -->
<url>http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/</url>
<layout>default</layout>
<snapshots>
<enabled>true</enabled>
</snapshots>
</repository>
</repositories>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId>
<artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId>
<!-- (2) -->
<version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>net.sf.sunxacml</groupId>
<artifactId>sunxacml</artifactId>
<version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<classifier>tests</classifier>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<dependencies>
Please note:
(1) use the URL of a real sf.net mirror, not the sf.net URL itself. Open
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/
and then
http://switch.dl.sourceforge.net/project/sunxacml/maven/snapshots/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/
The first page shows you a SF.net file listing. Clicking on any file leads to a mirror selection screen. The second link links to the right directory directly.
(2) Farrukh: Can you publish the artifacts for 2.0-M1? Or am i allowed to do this? Is there some documentation about publishing/pushing artifacts?
Cheers,
Lennart
Am 22.07.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Farrukh Najmi:
> Hi Kaleb,
>
> We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the
> sunxacml project. See the tree at:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/
>
> But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be
> done is probably quite simple.
> I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to
> set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump
> on this issue?
>
> On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
>> Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most
>> recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything
>> that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor
>> mvnbrowser.com.
>>
>> I've been using the following JBoss repository:
>>
>> <repository>
>> <id>jboss</id>
>> <name>jboss-repository</name>
>> <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url>
>> <releases></releases>
>> </repository>
>>
>> Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the
>> JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact:
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId>
>> <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId>
>> <version>2.0.4</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon,
>> and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --Kaleb
>>
>> PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything
>> other than spam there.
>>
>>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> sunxacml-devl mailing list
> sun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl
|
|
From: Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...> - 2010-07-29 18:04:26
|
Farrukh et al, If no progress has been made on the public maven repository, I'd be glad to help get things set up given appropriate access (I'm 'kibab' on SF and am one of the core maintainers of scponly, if that helps the with the trust issue). Please let me know. Thanks. -- Kaleb Pederson Blog - http://kalebpederson.com Twitter - http://twitter.com/kalebpederson On Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:31:40 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote: > Hi Kaleb, > > We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the > sunxacml project. See the tree at: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ > > But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be > done is probably quite simple. > I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to > set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump > on this issue? > > On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: > > Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most > > recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything > > that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor > > mvnbrowser.com. > > > > I've been using the following JBoss repository: > > > > <repository> > > <id>jboss</id> > > <name>jboss-repository</name> > > <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> > > <releases></releases> > > </repository> > > > > Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the > > JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: > > > > <dependency> > > <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> > > <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> > > <version>2.0.4</version> > > </dependency> > > > > I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, > > and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. > > > > Thanks. > > > > --Kaleb > > > > PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything > > other than spam there. > > > > > > |
|
From: Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...> - 2010-07-22 21:33:42
|
Hi Farrukh, Thanks for the details. I no longer have full admin access on any SF projects so I can't check, but I keep thinking you can't use the SF file manager but need to have a SF hosted website (i.e. Project Web - https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Project%20web). You should then be able to use scp/sftp to upload and manage files for release just as you would on a standard webserver. --Kaleb On Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:31:40 pm Farrukh Najmi wrote: > Hi Kaleb, > > We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the > sunxacml project. See the tree at: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ > > But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be > done is probably quite simple. > I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to > set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump > on this issue? > > On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: > > Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most > > recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything > > that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor > > mvnbrowser.com. > > > > I've been using the following JBoss repository: > > <repository> > > > > <id>jboss</id> > > <name>jboss-repository</name> > > <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> > > <releases></releases> > > > > </repository> > > > > Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the > > > > JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: > > <dependency> > > > > <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> > > <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> > > <version>2.0.4</version> > > > > </dependency> > > > > I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, > > and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. > > > > Thanks. > > > > --Kaleb > > > > PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything > > other than spam there. |
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-22 19:31:47
|
Hi Kaleb, We had tried to setup a maven repo with the SF project files for the sunxacml project. See the tree at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/ But this does not seem to work as a maven repo yet. What remains to be done is probably quite simple. I am hoping that someone knows how to correctly use SF project files to set up a repo. Can any one on the list help in getting us over the hump on this issue? On 07/22/2010 02:22 PM, Kaleb Pederson wrote: > Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most > recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything > that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor > mvnbrowser.com. > > I've been using the following JBoss repository: > > <repository> > <id>jboss</id> > <name>jboss-repository</name> > <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> > <releases></releases> > </repository> > > Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the > JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> > <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> > <version>2.0.4</version> > </dependency> > > I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, > and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. > > Thanks. > > --Kaleb > > PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything > other than spam there. > > -- Regards, Farrukh Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: Kaleb P. <kal...@gm...> - 2010-07-22 18:23:04
|
Is there a public maven repository somewhere that contains the most recent release (SunXACML-2.0-M1) of SunXACML? I didn't see anything that looked like it matched up on mvnrepository.com nor mvnbrowser.com. I've been using the following JBoss repository: <repository> <id>jboss</id> <name>jboss-repository</name> <url>http://repository.jboss.org/maven2</url> <releases></releases> </repository> Which contains a modified version of SunXACML (they also took the the JAXB route and have made other changes) in the following artifact: <dependency> <groupId>org.jboss.security</groupId> <artifactId>jboss-sunxacml</artifactId> <version>2.0.4</version> </dependency> I'm hoping to get closer to the source and be able to help out soon, and your mercurial repository will certainly help in that regard. Thanks. --Kaleb PS: Sorry if this belonged on sunxacml-discuss, I didn't see anything other than spam there. |
|
From: Seth P. <st...@al...> - 2010-07-15 11:39:05
|
Hi Lennart. > The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance vairable logger: That's actually a package. Are you looking specifically at the PolicyReader class? The reason for passing a logger here is that this is a utility class that could be embedded in someone's application which is probably already defining namespaces for loggers. Personally I (and others I've worked with) like being able to define our own loggers in this case so we don't have to track the namespaces from other packages for our output, but I think it's fine to have a default within the implementation too. seth |
|
From: <chr...@nv...> - 2010-07-15 04:38:12
|
+1 without comment Quoting Farrukh Najmi <fa...@we...>: > Hi Lennart, > > You are so good to have on the team. Thank you for offering to do slf4j > logging if others agree. > > +1 from me to do so. > > On 07/14/2010 01:49 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >> Errr... I'll do that (slf4j) - if the others agree... >> >> +1 from me. >> >> Am 14.07.2010 um 19:45 schrieb Lennart Jütte: >> >>> I'll do that. But i could take a while (I left my office just >>> after sending my last mail and just got home - so much to do...) >>> >>> The patch will be pushed in the next hour or two. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lennart >>> >>> Am 14.07.2010 um 18:43 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>> >>>> >>>> I do not understand why a Logger is being passed as aparm. It is >>>> a pattern I have never seen done. Seth? >>>> >>>> I would say your deprecation based patch sounds good. >>>> >>>> +1 to commit. >>>> >>>> As for supporting other Logging frameworks IMHO slf4j is >>>> currently the best alternative to using JDK loggers in a project. >>>> >>>> If others agree to slf4j then it would be great if you could >>>> replace current Logger code with slf4j as a separate patch from >>>> this one. >>>> >>>> Thanks Lennart! >>>> >>>> On 07/14/2010 10:20 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>> Nice, thank you! >>>>> >>>>> i'd say we add a null check in the constructor and create a new >>>>> logger if required. It's a quick fix that doesn't have any >>>>> impact on existing code of those using this library. >>>>> >>>>> But IMHO it's not very "clever" to demand a java.utilLogger at >>>>> all. What about someone who uses another logging Framework? So i >>>>> would add a new Constructor that doesn't require a logger and >>>>> set the old ones to @Deprecated. But that's just me, i think... >>>>> >>>>> Opinions? >>>>> A patch for the second solution is attached. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 14.07.2010 um 14:17 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>>> >>>>>> Done!. Welcome to the team. Please commit the proposed logger >>>>>> change to conform to prevailing conventions. If any doubts >>>>>> please post patch for review. >>>>>> Also make sure to pull latest changes since we are now on >>>>>> 2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT release in the trunk. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 07/14/2010 07:32 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Farrukh, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> my sfid: lajuette >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for adding me! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Lennart >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 14.07.2010 um 13:30 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> None that I can think of. Seth? BTW, please send me your sfid >>>>>>>> so I can add you as dev team member so you can make simple >>>>>>>> fixes like yourself this after discussion on the list. Thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 07/14/2010 05:04 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>>>>>> The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance >>>>>>>>> vairable logger: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> // the optional logger used for error reporting >>>>>>>>> private Logger logger; >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It has to be set via the constructor. It is not optional at >>>>>>>>> all. Any reason for this? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh Najmi > > Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-14 18:47:49
|
Hi Lennart, You are so good to have on the team. Thank you for offering to do slf4j logging if others agree. +1 from me to do so. On 07/14/2010 01:49 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: > Errr... I'll do that (slf4j) - if the others agree... > > +1 from me. > > Am 14.07.2010 um 19:45 schrieb Lennart Jütte: > >> I'll do that. But i could take a while (I left my office just after >> sending my last mail and just got home - so much to do...) >> >> The patch will be pushed in the next hour or two. >> >> Cheers, >> Lennart >> >> Am 14.07.2010 um 18:43 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >> >>> >>> I do not understand why a Logger is being passed as aparm. It is a >>> pattern I have never seen done. Seth? >>> >>> I would say your deprecation based patch sounds good. >>> >>> +1 to commit. >>> >>> As for supporting other Logging frameworks IMHO slf4j is currently >>> the best alternative to using JDK loggers in a project. >>> >>> If others agree to slf4j then it would be great if you could replace >>> current Logger code with slf4j as a separate patch from this one. >>> >>> Thanks Lennart! >>> >>> On 07/14/2010 10:20 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>> Nice, thank you! >>>> >>>> i'd say we add a null check in the constructor and create a new >>>> logger if required. It's a quick fix that doesn't have any impact >>>> on existing code of those using this library. >>>> >>>> But IMHO it's not very "clever" to demand a java.utilLogger at >>>> all. What about someone who uses another logging Framework? So i >>>> would add a new Constructor that doesn't require a logger and set >>>> the old ones to @Deprecated. But that's just me, i think... >>>> >>>> Opinions? >>>> A patch for the second solution is attached. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 14.07.2010 um 14:17 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>> >>>>> Done!. Welcome to the team. Please commit the proposed logger >>>>> change to conform to prevailing conventions. If any doubts please >>>>> post patch for review. >>>>> Also make sure to pull latest changes since we are now on >>>>> 2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT release in the trunk. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> On 07/14/2010 07:32 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>>> Hi Farrukh, >>>>>> >>>>>> my sfid: lajuette >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for adding me! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Lennart >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 14.07.2010 um 13:30 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> None that I can think of. Seth? BTW, please send me your sfid so >>>>>>> I can add you as dev team member so you can make simple fixes >>>>>>> like yourself this after discussion on the list. Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 07/14/2010 05:04 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>>>>> The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance >>>>>>>> vairable logger: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> // the optional logger used for error reporting >>>>>>>> private Logger logger; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It has to be set via the constructor. It is not optional at >>>>>>>> all. Any reason for this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-14 17:49:41
|
Errr... I'll do that (slf4j) - if the others agree... +1 from me. Am 14.07.2010 um 19:45 schrieb Lennart Jütte: > I'll do that. But i could take a while (I left my office just after sending my last mail and just got home - so much to do...) > > The patch will be pushed in the next hour or two. > > Cheers, > Lennart > > Am 14.07.2010 um 18:43 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > >> >> I do not understand why a Logger is being passed as aparm. It is a pattern I have never seen done. Seth? >> >> I would say your deprecation based patch sounds good. >> >> +1 to commit. >> >> As for supporting other Logging frameworks IMHO slf4j is currently the best alternative to using JDK loggers in a project. >> >> If others agree to slf4j then it would be great if you could replace current Logger code with slf4j as a separate patch from this one. >> >> Thanks Lennart! >> >> On 07/14/2010 10:20 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>> >>> Nice, thank you! >>> >>> i'd say we add a null check in the constructor and create a new logger if required. It's a quick fix that doesn't have any impact on existing code of those using this library. >>> >>> But IMHO it's not very "clever" to demand a java.utilLogger at all. What about someone who uses another logging Framework? So i would add a new Constructor that doesn't require a logger and set the old ones to @Deprecated. But that's just me, i think... >>> >>> Opinions? >>> A patch for the second solution is attached. >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 14.07.2010 um 14:17 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>> >>>> Done!. Welcome to the team. Please commit the proposed logger change to conform to prevailing conventions. If any doubts please post patch for review. >>>> Also make sure to pull latest changes since we are now on 2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT release in the trunk. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> On 07/14/2010 07:32 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Farrukh, >>>>> >>>>> my sfid: lajuette >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for adding me! >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Lennart >>>>> >>>>> Am 14.07.2010 um 13:30 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> None that I can think of. Seth? BTW, please send me your sfid so I can add you as dev team member so you can make simple fixes like yourself this after discussion on the list. Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 07/14/2010 05:04 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance vairable logger: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> // the optional logger used for error reporting >>>>>>> private Logger logger; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It has to be set via the constructor. It is not optional at all. Any reason for this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Farrukh >>>> >>>> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Farrukh Najmi >> >> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first_______________________________________________ > sunxacml-devl mailing list > sun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-14 17:45:31
|
I'll do that. But i could take a while (I left my office just after sending my last mail and just got home - so much to do...) The patch will be pushed in the next hour or two. Cheers, Lennart Am 14.07.2010 um 18:43 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > > I do not understand why a Logger is being passed as aparm. It is a pattern I have never seen done. Seth? > > I would say your deprecation based patch sounds good. > > +1 to commit. > > As for supporting other Logging frameworks IMHO slf4j is currently the best alternative to using JDK loggers in a project. > > If others agree to slf4j then it would be great if you could replace current Logger code with slf4j as a separate patch from this one. > > Thanks Lennart! > > On 07/14/2010 10:20 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >> >> Nice, thank you! >> >> i'd say we add a null check in the constructor and create a new logger if required. It's a quick fix that doesn't have any impact on existing code of those using this library. >> >> But IMHO it's not very "clever" to demand a java.utilLogger at all. What about someone who uses another logging Framework? So i would add a new Constructor that doesn't require a logger and set the old ones to @Deprecated. But that's just me, i think... >> >> Opinions? >> A patch for the second solution is attached. >> >> >> >> Am 14.07.2010 um 14:17 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >> >>> Done!. Welcome to the team. Please commit the proposed logger change to conform to prevailing conventions. If any doubts please post patch for review. >>> Also make sure to pull latest changes since we are now on 2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT release in the trunk. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> On 07/14/2010 07:32 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Farrukh, >>>> >>>> my sfid: lajuette >>>> >>>> Thanks for adding me! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lennart >>>> >>>> Am 14.07.2010 um 13:30 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> None that I can think of. Seth? BTW, please send me your sfid so I can add you as dev team member so you can make simple fixes like yourself this after discussion on the list. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> On 07/14/2010 05:04 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance vairable logger: >>>>>> >>>>>> // the optional logger used for error reporting >>>>>> private Logger logger; >>>>>> >>>>>> It has to be set via the constructor. It is not optional at all. Any reason for this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Farrukh >>> >>> Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh Najmi > > Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com > |
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-14 16:43:32
|
I do not understand why a Logger is being passed as aparm. It is a pattern I have never seen done. Seth? I would say your deprecation based patch sounds good. +1 to commit. As for supporting other Logging frameworks IMHO slf4j is currently the best alternative to using JDK loggers in a project. If others agree to slf4j then it would be great if you could replace current Logger code with slf4j as a separate patch from this one. Thanks Lennart! On 07/14/2010 10:20 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: > Nice, thank you! > > i'd say we add a null check in the constructor and create a new logger > if required. It's a quick fix that doesn't have any impact on existing > code of those using this library. > > But IMHO it's not very "clever" to demand a java.utilLogger at all. > What about someone who uses another logging Framework? So i would add > a new Constructor that doesn't require a logger and set the old ones > to @Deprecated. But that's just me, i think... > > Opinions? > A patch for the second solution is attached. > > > > Am 14.07.2010 um 14:17 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > >> Done!. Welcome to the team. Please commit the proposed logger change >> to conform to prevailing conventions. If any doubts please post patch >> for review. >> Also make sure to pull latest changes since we are now on >> 2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT release in the trunk. >> >> Thanks. >> >> On 07/14/2010 07:32 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>> Hi Farrukh, >>> >>> my sfid: lajuette >>> >>> Thanks for adding me! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lennart >>> >>> Am 14.07.2010 um 13:30 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >>> >>>> >>>> None that I can think of. Seth? BTW, please send me your sfid so I >>>> can add you as dev team member so you can make simple fixes like >>>> yourself this after discussion on the list. Thanks. >>>> >>>> On 07/14/2010 05:04 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>>> The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance >>>>> vairable logger: >>>>> >>>>> // the optional logger used for error reporting >>>>> private Logger logger; >>>>> >>>>> It has to be set via the constructor. It is not optional at all. >>>>> Any reason for this? >>>>> >>>>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Farrukh >> >> Web:http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com >> >> > -- Regards, Farrukh Najmi Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-14 14:20:27
|
Nice, thank you! i'd say we add a null check in the constructor and create a new logger if required. It's a quick fix that doesn't have any impact on existing code of those using this library. But IMHO it's not very "clever" to demand a java.utilLogger at all. What about someone who uses another logging Framework? So i would add a new Constructor that doesn't require a logger and set the old ones to @Deprecated. But that's just me, i think... Opinions? A patch for the second solution is attached. Am 14.07.2010 um 14:17 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > Done!. Welcome to the team. Please commit the proposed logger change to conform to prevailing conventions. If any doubts please post patch for review. > Also make sure to pull latest changes since we are now on 2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT release in the trunk. > > Thanks. > > On 07/14/2010 07:32 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >> >> Hi Farrukh, >> >> my sfid: lajuette >> >> Thanks for adding me! >> >> Cheers, >> Lennart >> >> Am 14.07.2010 um 13:30 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: >> >>> >>> None that I can think of. Seth? BTW, please send me your sfid so I can add you as dev team member so you can make simple fixes like yourself this after discussion on the list. Thanks. >>> >>> On 07/14/2010 05:04 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>>> >>>> The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance vairable logger: >>>> >>>> // the optional logger used for error reporting >>>> private Logger logger; >>>> >>>> It has to be set via the constructor. It is not optional at all. Any reason for this? >>>> >>>> > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh > > Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com > |
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-14 12:21:16
|
Done!. Welcome to the team. Please commit the proposed logger change to conform to prevailing conventions. If any doubts please post patch for review. Also make sure to pull latest changes since we are now on 2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT release in the trunk. Thanks. On 07/14/2010 07:32 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: > Hi Farrukh, > > my sfid: lajuette > > Thanks for adding me! > > Cheers, > Lennart > > Am 14.07.2010 um 13:30 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > >> >> None that I can think of. Seth? BTW, please send me your sfid so I >> can add you as dev team member so you can make simple fixes like >> yourself this after discussion on the list. Thanks. >> >> On 07/14/2010 05:04 AM, Lennart Jütte wrote: >>> The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance vairable >>> logger: >>> >>> // the optional logger used for error reporting >>> private Logger logger; >>> >>> It has to be set via the constructor. It is not optional at all. Any >>> reason for this? >>> >>> -- Regards, Farrukh Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-14 09:04:46
|
The class com.sun.xacml.support.finder contains an instance vairable logger:
// the optional logger used for error reporting
private Logger logger;
It has to be set via the constructor. It is not optional at all. Any reason for this?
Cheers,
Lennart |
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-12 15:07:01
|
Hi Guys, The 2.0-M1 release has been cut and deployed to the releases maven repo at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/sunxacml/files/maven/releases/net/sf/sunxacml/sunxacml/2.0-M1 This is the first formal release in a long time and it is the first formal release ever to be tightly managed by the maven-release-plugin. The master repo has also been updated for the next SNAPSHOT release 2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT. Please sync your local repos with changes to the master repo. Is there any one who can test the release and report if there are any issues? We should announce this release to the user community after we have validated the release. Is there any one who can put together the release announcement with major changes since the last formal release? Thanks for your help. -- Regards, Farrukh Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: <chr...@nv...> - 2010-07-10 05:05:51
|
Works for me Quoting Farrukh Najmi <fa...@we...>: > Hi Guys, > > Revisiting this older thread. > > I need a release of 2.0 so that my own project can be released using > maven-release-plugin (which does not allow SNAPSHOT dependencies). > Is there any objection to doing a formal release of what we have in > master repo's trunk as release 2.0-M1 (2.0 milestone 1). > > No doc changes etc would be done for the proposed release. > > Any objections? > > > On 05/25/2010 05:00 AM, chr...@nv... wrote: >> Quoting Lennart Jütte <li...@rt...>: >> >>> jEdit does syntax highlighting (vi and emacs, too). But WYSIWYG is a >>> whole other thing. >> >> Yep, and thats the reason for opening a browser, navigating to the >> html document and pressing reload after a "make html". >> >>> >>> >>> > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh > > Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ > sunxacml-devl mailing list > sun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-devl > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Farrukh N. <fa...@we...> - 2010-07-09 20:57:24
|
Hi Lennart. Your patch is committed. Thank you. On 07/04/2010 02:29 PM, Lennart Jütte wrote: > Well, I'd like to have commit access to commit small patches like this, so i don't have to bother you with commiting it for me. > > But i can't really commit to this project. i.e. i don't know if i have enough time and if i'll still work with sunxacml after my thesis is done. I *may* continue to work for the same company (don't worry, everything i've done so far was done at home) and then i *may* continue to work with Christian's geoxacml module and sunxacml. But it's not sure. Not at all. > > FYI - Christian: I have a patch for the GeoServer geoxacml module. I removed the sunxacml-code and added a dependency to the artifact. I'll post it to the geoserver-user mailinglist soon. > > > Am 04.07.2010 um 18:50 schrieb Farrukh Najmi: > > >> +1 to commit this. As I recall you do not want commit access for some reason. I will commit on your behalf tomorrow if it is not committed by then. Thanks. >> >> Lennart Jütte wrote: >> >>> I'd like to see a -tests artifact in the official sunxacml repository. I attached a patch that modifies pom.xml so the tests.jar is generated on deployment. >>> >>> >>> >> -- Regards, Farrukh Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com |
|
From: Lennart J. <li...@rt...> - 2010-07-09 20:42:13
|
http://gis.linux4all.at/hudsonxacml/job/sunxacml/24/ 1) Thanks to you Farrukh for commiting. 2) The polling for changes in the hg repository seems to work! Yay! 3) The only missing piece is the publishing of the freshly built artifacts. Is there a way to Set up some kind of dropbox-user for the sf.net storage? I don't think anyone likes to store his credentials on the hudson machine. Publishing per se works fine. I tested it with my own server and published via scp. Cheers, Lennart |
