Re: [sunxacml-discuss] Re: [xacml-dev] SubjectAttributeDesignator question

[argyn <ar...@co...>]

I'm not aware of any big company, which switched or approved Java 1.5 
for server-side deployments. i guess they ar fine with client-side Java 
1.5, but there's hardly any need in xacml on client pcs.

argyn

Seth Proctor wrote:

>On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 05:39:19PM -0500, argyn wrote:
>  
>
>>I wrote a little xacml 2.0 implementation in Java 1.5 and it looked much 
>>cleaner with parameterized types, enums and other cool stuff. 
>>unfortunately, noone's using 1.5 yet in production
>>    
>>
> 
>Well, yeah. A lot of the code would look somewhat cleaner with 5, but
>until I get the sense that users are willing to deploy JSE5 systems, I'm
>not really willing to switch over all the codebase.
>
>Have any users on this list made the switch already?
>
>
>seth
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>sunxacml-discuss mailing list
>sun...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sunxacml-discuss
>
>
>  
>