Re: [sunxacml-discuss] About "missing-attribute"
Brought to you by:
farrukh_najmi,
sethp
|
From: Seth P. <set...@su...> - 2006-01-03 16:03:40
|
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 04:04:37PM +0800, Jing Yixin wrote: > Does anyone know whether the latest implementation supports the status > "missing-attribute" of a response? Yes, but not with any detail. The short version is that the 1.2 release will return the missing-attribute status, and the 2.0 codebase will soon support the optional inclusion of which attribute was missing. From a comment in com.sun.xacml.attr.AttributeDesignator: Note that there is a bug in the XACML spec. You can't specify an identifier without specifying acceptable values. Until this is fixed, this code will only return the status code, and not any hints about what was missing seth |