I think swappable, provider-driven HTML editor is the best solution.
:DG<
On 8/13/05, Phil Haack <ha...@gm...> wrote:
> So I'm considering purchasing the redistributable license of
> FreeTextBox ($199). This would enable a few things. First, I could
> redistribute a compiled version of FreeTextBox pro, thus everyone who
> uses Subtext would have the Pro version of FTB as their blog editor
> (and gain the all-important XHTML editing, and MS Word cleanup).
>=20
> Second, I would get the source code and be allowed to recompile it.
> So if we needed Subtext specific changes, we'd be set.
>=20
> Just wanted to get your thoughts on this before I moved forward.
> Ideally, I'd prefer a redistributable of the Telerik r.a.d. control,
> but that's too expensive AND I don't think it uses the WebResource.axd
> (embedded resources) that FTB does.
>=20
>=20
> Another thing to consider is creating a RichTextEditorProvider ala
> DotNetNuke. THat way, a user who has a license to CuteEditor or
> Telerik, could easily swap it out. Anyone want to tackle that? You
> can basically rip off the DNN code.
>=20
> Phil
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practic=
es
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & Q=
A
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> Subtext-devs mailing list
> Sub...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/subtext-devs
>
|
