Re: strace sys_clone bug on x86-32

[Dmitry V. L. <ld...@al...>]

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:19:20PM -0700, enh wrote:
> i don't think
> 
> commit f94e84780e96221a4b3e8eb39bfa2d227d367f69
[...]
> builds for I386, because there's a dangling 'else'.

Indeed, thanks for reporting.  I should have spotted it myself, though.

> that's why my
> version had the "int print_raw_tls = 1;"

No, it didn't.  At least not the patch you submitted
(x86-64-user_desc.txt) and I applied.  Now I see print_raw_tls was
mentioned in the text part of the message, but I surely missed it.

> alternatively, you could have another #ifdef:

This change is a part of another commit (v4.8-157-g99a0544) that hopefully
fixes the whole thing.


-- 
ldv