From: Zubin M. <zub...@gm...> - 2014-03-21 13:43:02
|
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Dmitry V. Levin <ld...@al...> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:20:25PM +0530, Zubin Mithra wrote: >> Hey everyone, >> >> Based on the valuable discussion above, I've written out a first draft >> of the proposal for the ideas related to path decoding and structured >> output. >> >> Please find the initial draft here[1] -- any opinions and feedback >> would be invaluable. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Zubin >> [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SRbgSNkm4UWxsSF5rHiRpuZvQBSc6YCS9c6wL-TT--4/ > > With regards to replacing all calls to tprintf/tprints with > another pair of functions with the same semantics, I recommend to avoid > mass renames that bring no benefit. The same goal could be achieved by > converting tprintf/tprints functions to function pointers. > > I suppose implementing structured output would require converting > calls of unstructured tprintf/tprints functions to something well > structured, like printers of basic data types or their elements. Thank you very much for the feedback, Philippe and Dmitry. I've made a proposal submission at Melange. Can we join an IRC channel(#strace on freenode.net perhaps?)? Thanks, zm |