|
From: Dmitry V. L. <ld...@al...> - 2013-05-08 23:30:45
|
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:46:08PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 08 May 2013 14:22:37 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 May 2013 12:08:14 Dmitry V. Levin wrote: [...] > > > I'm inclined to rewrite that part of the test in C, > > > so that more "long long" syscalls could be tested. > > > > so i've been maintaining a testsuite specifically designed to exercise > > specific C lib funcs and syscalls. it's a framework that makes poking > > funcs from the command line dirt simple. i wonder if it wouldn't find a > > good home in strace. So the most of testsuite appears to be written already. Isn't it nice? :) I'm perfectly OK to take it as a base for strace testsuite, but it might be not quite convenient for sandbox.git to pull the whole strace.git just to use some *-0.c files. > or maybe a neutral ground as a sub-project of LTP ? and strace/sandbox can > pull them in as git submodules. seems like it'd be a good fit in the LTP > umbrella. i have commit access there too, so it's not like it'd be hard. I'm not sure about LTP for the same technical reason: pulling the whole ltp.git just to use one little subproject is inconvenient. Maybe it's worth creating a standalone project? -- ldv |