ssic-linux-users Mailing List for OpenSSI Clusters for Linux (Page 5)
Brought to you by:
brucewalker,
rogertsang
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(48) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(107) |
Oct
(112) |
Nov
(112) |
Dec
(70) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(155) |
Feb
(283) |
Mar
(200) |
Apr
(107) |
May
(73) |
Jun
(171) |
Jul
(127) |
Aug
(119) |
Sep
(91) |
Oct
(116) |
Nov
(175) |
Dec
(143) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(168) |
Feb
(237) |
Mar
(222) |
Apr
(183) |
May
(111) |
Jun
(153) |
Jul
(123) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(95) |
Oct
(179) |
Nov
(95) |
Dec
(119) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(18) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Scott W. <sc...@sl...> - 2010-09-14 17:21:34
|
I don't understand the logic behind trying to recompile kernels. In the old days of probing ISA cards, the wrong set of actual hardware and drivers built-in to the kernel could cause crashes on boot, but that sort of thing is very rare these days. Boot the OpenSSI kernel and if the machine freezes during boot, post the last several console lines. -scott On 9/14/10, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior <gla...@ya...> wrote: > John Hughes escreveu: >> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 01:08 -0300, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior >> wrote: >> >>> I tried latter to compile the kernel 2.6.11-ssi-686-smp in this box, >>> changing only the processor type and removing the SMP support. >>> >>> During the compilation, the machine just hung when compiling the >>> following line: >>> >>> kernel/ptrace.o >>> >> sounds like the machine is broken. >> >> >> > > I'm not sure about that. I started compiling the regular Debian Sarge > kernel from the kernel-source package yesterday and after 7 hours it's > still compiling. > > As soon as it finishes, I'll try a second time with OpenSSI source and, > if it not work, I'll try again but loading the configuration from the > regular Sarge kernel. > > I'll let you know as soon as I finish those tests. > > Regards, > Alceu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Ssic-linux-users mailing list > Ssi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users > |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-09-14 12:37:31
|
John Hughes escreveu: > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 01:08 -0300, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior > wrote: > >> I tried latter to compile the kernel 2.6.11-ssi-686-smp in this box, >> changing only the processor type and removing the SMP support. >> >> During the compilation, the machine just hung when compiling the >> following line: >> >> kernel/ptrace.o >> > sounds like the machine is broken. > > > I'm not sure about that. I started compiling the regular Debian Sarge kernel from the kernel-source package yesterday and after 7 hours it's still compiling. As soon as it finishes, I'll try a second time with OpenSSI source and, if it not work, I'll try again but loading the configuration from the regular Sarge kernel. I'll let you know as soon as I finish those tests. Regards, Alceu |
|
From: John H. <jo...@ca...> - 2010-09-14 06:22:09
|
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 01:08 -0300, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior wrote: > I tried latter to compile the kernel 2.6.11-ssi-686-smp in this box, > changing only the processor type and removing the SMP support. > > During the compilation, the machine just hung when compiling the > following line: > > kernel/ptrace.o > sounds like the machine is broken. |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-09-14 04:08:16
|
Gentleman, I tried to install OpenSSI 1.9.6 in Debian Sarge running in the following hardware: jackal@master:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 5 model : 4 model name : Pentium MMX stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 233.825 fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : yes coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 mmx bogomips : 459.77 jackal@master:~$ lspci 0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5597 [SiS5582] (rev 02) 0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513 (LPC Bridge) (rev 01) 0000:00:01.1 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev d0) 0000:00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) 0000:00:14.0 VGA compatible controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5597/5598/6326 VGA (rev 65) The hardware is quite old, so I didn't expect to have issues regarding drivers. Setup in this machine was quite straightforward, without any noise besides ipvsadm complain (which was expected, I think). The only thing that I changed is that I used a Debian Sarge CDROM to start the install, then I added the URI below to sources.list: deb http://archive.debian.org/debian/ Debian-3.1 main contrib The problem was when I tried to boot with the OpenSSI kernel: after initial messages from the kernel, the monitor goes black and the machine just restarted alone. After that I tried adding "noapic" option in the menu.lst file, but the result was the same. I tried to boot also by using the rescue option with the OpenSSI kernel (grub) but again all I got was a black screen and a automatic reboot. I tried latter to compile the kernel 2.6.11-ssi-686-smp in this box, changing only the processor type and removing the SMP support. During the compilation, the machine just hung when compiling the following line: kernel/ptrace.o The machine just freezed, I could not boot by using the keyboard (the numlock and caps locks just didn't respond after some clicks), I had to reboot the machine by using the reset button. I intend to compile the kernel 2.6.8-4-386 (Debian Sarge Vanilla) just to check if it's not a kernel option or a bug, but I would appreciate any help about this issue. Thanks in advance, Alceu |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-09-10 05:02:07
|
Hello Scott, COmments below... Scott Walters escreveu: >> - lspci: >> >> 0000:00:00.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ea (rev a1) >> 0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e0 (rev a2) >> 0000:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03eb (rev a2) >> 0000:00:01.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f5 (rev a2) >> 0000:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f1 >> (rev a3) >> 0000:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f2 >> (rev a3) >> 0000:00:04.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f3 (rev a1) >> 0000:00:05.0 0403: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f0 (rev a2) >> 0000:00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ec (rev a2) >> 0000:00:07.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ef (rev a2) >> 0000:00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f6 (rev a2) >> 0000:00:08.1 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f6 (rev a2) >> 0000:00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e8 (rev a2) >> 0000:00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e9 (rev a2) >> 0000:00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e9 (rev a2) >> 0000:00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown >> device 03d0 (rev a2) >> 0000:01:06.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105 >> [Rhine-III] (rev 8b) > > The only thing not unknown is the Ethernet card. What's up with that? > Do you have modules installed in /lib/modules for the OpenSSI kernel > (eg /lib/modules/2.6.14-ssi-686-smp where "2.6.14-ssi-686-smp" matches > the name of the initrd and vmlinuz in /boot ) ? Indeed, I was not able to put the onboard ethernet card to work. Just cannot load the appropriated kernel module to do that. > No, that probably isn't it. I think the nVidia chipsets are just way too new. Don't know if this is the real reason. I could not compile the .c file from Nvidia website, but the kernel from Sarge look like already have such module (just don't know if it is the correct version). To fix that, I just inserted an offboard ethernet card (Rhine-III) and everything worked fine. > Interesting bits of dmesg would be further down. Feel free to send > the full dmesg to me directly. Ok! > I discovered that it's harder than I would have guessed to figure out > if Linux supports any given PCI device by ID. NetBSD hardcodes those > in .h files. I couldn't establish that supported devices on my own > system were supported from looking at the code. *sigh* So trying the > older machine (or else virtual hardware) is your best bet. Let me know if you need further info. Anyway, I tested OpenSSI in a very, very old machine here. Let's call it "meth" (shorter version of "Methuselah"): jackal@master:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 5 model : 4 model name : Pentium MMX stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 233.825 fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : yes coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 mmx bogomips : 459.77 jackal@master:~$ lspci 0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5597 [SiS5582] (rev 02) 0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS85C503/5513 (LPC Bridge) (rev 01) 0000:00:01.1 IDE interface: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5513 [IDE] (rev d0) 0000:00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) 0000:00:14.0 VGA compatible controller: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5597/5598/6326 VGA (rev 65) Setup in this machine was quite straightforward, without any noise besides ipvsadm complain (which was expected, I think). The only thing that I changed is that I used a Debian Sarge CDROM to start the install, then I added the URI below to sources.list: deb http://archive.debian.org/debian/ Debian-3.1 main contrib # updates was not available The problem was when I tried to boot with the OpenSSI kernel: after initial messages from the kernel, the monitor goes black and the machine just restarted alone. After that I tried adding "noapic" option in the menu.lst file, but the result was the same. I tried to boot also by using the rescue option with the OpenSSI kernel (grub) but again all I got was a black screen and a automatic reboot. Should I try to compile the OpenSSI kernel in this box? I'll try Fedora in both boxes and I'll let you know about the results. Thanks for helping, Alceu |
|
From: Scott W. <sc...@sl...> - 2010-09-09 18:04:14
|
> - lspci: > > 0000:00:00.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ea (rev a1) > 0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e0 (rev a2) > 0000:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03eb (rev a2) > 0000:00:01.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f5 (rev a2) > 0000:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f1 > (rev a3) > 0000:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f2 > (rev a3) > 0000:00:04.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f3 (rev a1) > 0000:00:05.0 0403: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f0 (rev a2) > 0000:00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ec (rev a2) > 0000:00:07.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ef (rev a2) > 0000:00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f6 (rev a2) > 0000:00:08.1 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f6 (rev a2) > 0000:00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e8 (rev a2) > 0000:00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e9 (rev a2) > 0000:00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e9 (rev a2) > 0000:00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown > device 03d0 (rev a2) > 0000:01:06.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105 > [Rhine-III] (rev 8b) The only thing not unknown is the Ethernet card. What's up with that? Do you have modules installed in /lib/modules for the OpenSSI kernel (eg /lib/modules/2.6.14-ssi-686-smp where "2.6.14-ssi-686-smp" matches the name of the initrd and vmlinuz in /boot ) ? No, that probably isn't it. I think the nVidia chipsets are just way too new. Interesting bits of dmesg would be further down. Feel free to send the full dmesg to me directly. I discovered that it's harder than I would have guessed to figure out if Linux supports any given PCI device by ID. NetBSD hardcodes those in .h files. I couldn't establish that supported devices on my own system were supported from looking at the code. *sigh* So trying the older machine (or else virtual hardware) is your best bet. Cheers, -scott |
|
From: MatrixS_Master <mat...@ya...> - 2010-09-09 17:43:15
|
Hello! Linuxquestions is a bad choice. Try this storage: Index of /Linux on Riken.JP I've downloaded FC3 iso here. A very big archive. Direct link looks like http://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/fedora/core/3/i386/iso/ Kind regards, Dmitry. 09/09/2010 в 02:43 -0300, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior: > Greetings, > > I'm looking for downloading a Fedora 3 CDROM media to give a try > installing OpenSSI on it, but I'm not being able to find any repository > that contains such media. Even http://www.linuxiso.org seems to still > have Fedora 3 medias download. > > Could you guys please provide an method to download Fedora 3? After > searching in Google, all results ended in finding only the version 7 as > the most old version available for download. > > Thanks in advance, > Alceu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > Ssic-linux-users mailing list > Ssi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users > |
|
From: Mulyadi S. <mul...@gm...> - 2010-09-09 17:19:08
|
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 23:50, Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. <gla...@ya...> wrote: > Yup. This is a broken link: > > "This Page Cannot Be Displayed > > The file ( > ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/fedora/linux/core/3/i386/iso/FC3-i386-disc1.iso How about this one? http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/3/i386/iso/ -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. Jr. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-09-09 16:50:18
|
----- Mensagem original ---- > De: Mulyadi Santosa <mul...@gm...> > Para: Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior <gla...@ya...> > Cc: ssi...@li... > Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2010 3:52:45 > Assunto: Re: [SSI-users] download of Fedora 3 > > > I'm looking for downloading a Fedora 3 CDROM media to give a try > > installing OpenSSI on it, but I'm not being able to find any repository > > that contains such media. Even http://www.linuxiso.org seems to still > > have Fedora 3 medias download. > > uhm, have you tried this? > http://iso.linuxquestions.org/fedora/fedora-core-3/ > Yup. This is a broken link: "This Page Cannot Be Displayed The file ( ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/fedora/linux/core/3/i386/iso/FC3-i386-disc1.iso ) could not be found. The address is either incorrect or obsolete. If you have questions, or feel this is an error, please contact the local Helpdesk and provide the codes shown below. Notification codes: (1, FTP_NOT_FOUND, ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/fedora/linux/core/3/i386/iso/FC3-i386-disc1.iso)" |
|
From: Mulyadi S. <mul...@gm...> - 2010-09-09 06:53:33
|
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:43, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior <gla...@ya...> wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm looking for downloading a Fedora 3 CDROM media to give a try > installing OpenSSI on it, but I'm not being able to find any repository > that contains such media. Even http://www.linuxiso.org seems to still > have Fedora 3 medias download. uhm, have you tried this? http://iso.linuxquestions.org/fedora/fedora-core-3/ -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-09-09 05:43:52
|
Greetings, I'm looking for downloading a Fedora 3 CDROM media to give a try installing OpenSSI on it, but I'm not being able to find any repository that contains such media. Even http://www.linuxiso.org seems to still have Fedora 3 medias download. Could you guys please provide an method to download Fedora 3? After searching in Google, all results ended in finding only the version 7 as the most old version available for download. Thanks in advance, Alceu |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-09-09 02:48:39
|
Hello there Scott,
Scott Walters :
> Yes, QEMU would be handy for diagnosing problems. That would rule out
> hardware compat/support problems.
>
> Not finding the root drive sounds like very probably lack of support
> for your hard drive controller.
>
> If you want to use your real hardware, you might get an IDE66
> controller off of eBay cheap and install on that. If you have an
> on-board IDE controller, using that instead of SATA might work too.
This give a another idea... I do have a real old box here. I'll give it
a try with OpenSSI and let you know.
> If you boot a recent kernel (eg, on Knoppix or another live CD) and
> then post the output of `dmesg` and `lspci`, I (or someone) will
> likely be able to tell you whether this is the case that your SATA
> controller isn't supported.
This is easy. Since I still can boot with Debian vanilla kernel, I can
get this data anytime.
To do that, I had to "fix" the /etc/fstab changed by OpenSSI install,
that was like this:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
proc /proc proc defaults,node=* 0 0
/dev/hda1 / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro,node=1 0 1
/dev/hda9 /home ext3 defaults,node=1 0 2
/dev/hda8 /tmp ext3 defaults,node=1 0 2
/dev/hda5 /usr ext3 defaults,node=1 0 2
/dev/hda6 /var ext3 defaults,node=1 0 2
/dev/hda7 none swap sw,node=1 0 0
/dev/hdb /media/cdrom0 iso9660 ro,user,noauto,node=1 0 0 /dev/fd0
/media/floppy0 auto rw,user,noauto,node=* 0 0
And I changed it to this:
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
proc /proc proc defaults,node=* 0 0
/dev/hda1 / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
/dev/hda9 /home ext3 defaults 0 2
/dev/hda8 /tmp ext3 defaults 0 2
/dev/hda5 /usr ext3 defaults 0 2
/dev/hda6 /var ext3 defaults 0 2
/dev/hda7 none swap sw,node=1 0 0
/dev/hdb /media/cdrom0 iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0
/dev/fd0 /media/floppy0 auto rw,user,noauto 0 0
During my tests with the OpenSSI kernel, it doesn't matter which version
of /etc/fstab I left. Anyway, when I tried to add drivers to the initrd,
I left the OpenSSI fstab version as configured.
Now let's go back to the data requested:
- lspci:
0000:00:00.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ea (rev a1)
0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e0 (rev a2)
0000:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03eb (rev a2)
0000:00:01.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f5 (rev a2)
0000:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f1
(rev a3)
0000:00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f2
(rev a3)
0000:00:04.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f3 (rev a1)
0000:00:05.0 0403: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f0 (rev a2)
0000:00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ec (rev a2)
0000:00:07.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03ef (rev a2)
0000:00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f6 (rev a2)
0000:00:08.1 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03f6 (rev a2)
0000:00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e8 (rev a2)
0000:00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e9 (rev a2)
0000:00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 03e9 (rev a2)
0000:00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown
device 03d0 (rev a2)
0000:01:06.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105
[Rhine-III] (rev 8b)
- dmesg: dmesg is a bit long to post to the list. Please let me know if
all the content of it should be posted. Anywhere, I put the parts that I
thought that were "interesting", but I can check for other parts as well.
...
CPU: After generic identify, caps: 078bfbff ebd3fbff 00000000 00000000
CPU: After vendor identify, caps: 078bfbff ebd3fbff 00000000 00000000
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 256K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: After all inits, caps: 078bfbff ebd3fbff 00000000 00000410
CPU: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1150 stepping 01
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
Checking for popad bug... OK.
enabled ExtINT on CPU#0
ESR value before enabling vector: 00000004
ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
init IO_APIC IRQs
IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 4-0, 4-16, 4-17, 4-18, 4-19, 4-20, 4-21, 4-22,
4-23 not connected.
..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=-1
Using local APIC timer interrupts.
calibrating APIC timer ...
..... CPU clock speed is 2009.0262 MHz.
..... host bus clock speed is 200.0926 MHz.
checking if image is initramfs...it isn't (ungzip failed); looks like an
initrd
...
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326
ACPI-0352: *** Error: Looking up [\_PR_.CPU0] in namespace,
AE_NOT_FOUND
search_node f7abda40 start_node f7abda40 return_node 00000000
ACPI-1133: *** Error: [NULL NAME], AE_NOT_FOUND
...
number of MP IRQ sources: 15.
number of IO-APIC #4 registers: 24.
testing the IO APIC.......................
IO APIC #4......
.... register #00: 04000000
....... : physical APIC id: 04
....... : Delivery Type: 0
....... : LTS : 0
.... register #01: 00170011
....... : max redirection entries: 0017
....... : PRQ implemented: 0
....... : IO APIC version: 0011
.... register #02: 04000000
....... : arbitration: 04
.... IRQ redirection table:
Thanks in advance,
Alceu
|
|
From: Scott W. <sc...@sl...> - 2010-09-08 04:11:35
|
Yes, QEMU would be handy for diagnosing problems. That would rule out hardware compat/support problems. Not finding the root drive sounds like very probably lack of support for your hard drive controller. If you want to use your real hardware, you might get an IDE66 controller off of eBay cheap and install on that. If you have an on-board IDE controller, using that instead of SATA might work too. If you boot a recent kernel (eg, on Knoppix or another live CD) and then post the output of `dmesg` and `lspci`, I (or someone) will likely be able to tell you whether this is the case that your SATA controller isn't supported. Cheers, -scott |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-09-08 02:21:17
|
John Hughes escreveu: > QEMU provides simple virtualised hardware, which is often easier to deal > with than real hardware. > > For example the QEMU provided NE2000 style NIC works perfectly with > OpenSSI, as does the QEMU IDE disk controller. > > (KVM, if it runs on your machine) should give the same benifits. > > For me the other advantage of QEMU is reducing the amount of work > necessary to continue from a screw up. > I'm not considering using QEMU because, even if I got it working, I will not be able to use it during my tests since I have a Perl program (that uses fork to divide processing work) that I would like to test if it can be improved without huge changes to it. Unless using QEMU helps me identifying an error during the procedures I'm executing, I do not see many reasons to using it. The hardware that I have available for testing does not have multiple processors/cores so I could take advantage of them by using hardware emulation. Please advise if QEMU could be used during my tests. I really don't know much about virtualization with QEMU. Thanks in advance, Alceu |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-09-08 02:21:15
|
Hello there, I'm facing the problems quite the same as you are. Maybe we could help each other. MatrixS_Master escreveu: > Then I tried to install old Sarge (r7) and OpenSSI v1. My sources.list > file looks like > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian sarge main contrib > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian-volatile/ > sarge/volatile main contrib > security updates commented out > in installation process. I did a different approach: I downloaded two of the three DVD's from Debian Sarge and executed a offline setup. During the setup, Sarge will try to get updates from security.debian.org. I had to unplug the box from the Internet (probably there is a better approach to avoid that, which I don't know) before continuing the setup. I added both DVD's as source for packages with apt-cdrom add, but did NOT select a single package besides the minimal setup. > After installing a minimal system, I tried > # echo "deb http://deb.openssi.org/openssi-v1/ ./" >>> /etc/apt/sources.list > modify apt preferences > # apt-get update > # apt-get dist-upgrade > # apt-get install openssi I did the same steps here, but I had to change the sources.list from: deb http://deb.openssi.org/v2 ./ deb-src http://deb.openssi.org/v2 ./ to: deb http://deb.openssi.org/openssi-v1.9.6 ./ deb-src http://deb.openssi.org/openssi-v1.9.6 ./ since my box could not locate the repository with the URL given by the documentation. From the version of sources.list you had used (deb http://deb.openssi.org/openssi-v1/ ./) I understand that you had tried to use version 1.2 of OpenSSI, which looks like is not being actively maintained. Look like the version 1.9.6 is the one to go. But were you able to download the packages from OpenSSI repository without changing the sources.list? I did not get a feedback about the URL's available in the documentation, if they are correct or not. But for me, the URL's in the don't work at all. The last try I gave I used kernel 2.6 with Sarge during install, since in the previous tests (with kernel 2.4) I got some error messages like "kernel does not support IPVS (2.6)", but I still got some warnings anyway. After that, I executed: apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade I got some packages downgrade, but this is expected. But I had to executed apt-get update twice, since in the first time I got an error message saying that Release file was not available. I got it after executing apt-get update a second time. > I answered to all of questions and program said that's all good. But > after reboot new kernel not loading. Grub unpacking the kernel image and > freezes. Kernel dead. Which error do you get? I always get this one: kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknow-block(1,0) Before that, my keyboard got's the CAPS-LOCK and SCROLL-LOCK leds flashing, which indicates some problem with the kernel to boot. Then I checked the mailing lists archives for some help. I found some tips to create a new initrd image with additional modules, specially ext3 module. I did that, editing the configuration of initrd in /etc, tried again: same issue. I even mount the initrd (with -o loop option) and double checked if the modules of ext3 and my network cards were available, and they were. A new try, I download the kernel source from OpenSSI repository and did a kernel compile. I used the config available in /boot to get most of the options already set, and changed ONLY the features below: 1 - Added ext3 and cramfs in the kernel image instead of using them as modules (this should avoid the need to use initrd modules) 2 - Changed the processor type to fit the processor available in my testing machine (a Sempron); 3 - Remove the SMP feature from the kernel, since my box is not SMP. Finally, I used make-kpkg program to generate a Debian package of the new kernel. It did not generate a initrd image. After that, I still getting the same kernel panic message (related to not being able to mount root fs). Then I tried to boot with the kernel in rescue mode and got this additional message: Instruction(i) breakpint #0 at 0xc011e510 (adjusted) 0xc011e510 panic_hook: int3 Entering kdb(current=0xc19a6aa0, pid 2) due to Breakpoint @0xc011e510 I don't know what I could execute in the prompt "kdb" which as opened. Looks like a debugging for the kernel. > I repeat all steps in fresh system, install kernel-patch-2.4-ipvs and > run kernel with this parameters: > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2199.ntpl-ssi-686-smp devfs=mount > root=/dev/hda1 ro > Nothing changed. Kernel looks like dead or infinitely waiting for > somewhat. I did the same, several times. Sometimes my box hanged because of ACPI (which I had disable with noapic option in Grub boot loader) but now I'm getting a kernel panic due not locating the root fs to boot. This is the error message I got from the kernel before setting noapic option: kernel-panic - not syncing: IO-APIC+times doesn't work! Boot with apic=debug and send a report. Then try booting with the 'noapic' option Does OpenSSI needs ACPI working? > I doubt about this situation. Where is my mistake? Can I install more > new release and where in root deb.openssi.org I can found it? > What OS would be preferable? Maybe I need to move to Fedora Core? > I'm VERY interesting in SSI clustering. I have 5 machines in special 1G > private network. They used independent and this is not comfortable. I still trying to isolate the problem, if is a error from the procedure I'm executing, a bug in the OpenSSI kernel or a defect in my box hardware (which I found difficult to be, since I can get a vanilla kernel working without problems). I would be happy to execute more tests or providing more information about the errors. Regards, Alceu |
|
From: John H. <jo...@Ca...> - 2010-08-26 08:57:28
|
Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior wrote: > Anyway, I still have problems with the setup in my machine and I don't > think is something related to hardware. Don't see how using QEMU would > help with that. > QEMU provides simple virtualised hardware, which is often easier to deal with than real hardware. For example the QEMU provided NE2000 style NIC works perfectly with OpenSSI, as does the QEMU IDE disk controller. (KVM, if it runs on your machine) should give the same benifits. For me the other advantage of QEMU is reducing the amount of work necessary to continue from a screw up. |
|
From: Scott W. <sc...@sl...> - 2010-08-26 04:03:42
|
Hi Dmitry, My experience is with the development branch of OpenSSI (1.9.x). Fedora seems to be an easier install target. Debian changes constantly. It will really help if you know how to diagnose problems in Linux in general. Installing OpenSSI seems to take people several tries. You might want to read through the mailing list archives to get an idea of the sorts of problems other people have had. Because of the older kernel OpenSSI is built on, newer hardware might not be supported. Your hard drive controller in particular might not be supported. You might have to stick a 66mhz IDE card into a PCI slot, or find an older, supported SATA card. Network cards in machines may or may not be supported. If the first node (or any other node) can't figure out what it's MAC address is, it will stop. Post a log of the install process and then the boot output. At which point it stops and what it says before it stops will be helpful in figuring out what went wrong. Good luck! -scott On 8/25/10, MatrixS_Master <mat...@ya...> wrote: > Hello all! > > My name is Dmitry Soloviov and I'm newbie to OpenSSI. And, like a thread > starter, got a lot of problems. > First I tried install OSSI 1.9.6 on my favorite Lenny in VirtualBox VM. > I've done steps 1-17 from this paper: > http://deb.openssi.org/openssi/dists/1.9.6-lenny-preview/ > On a last step I've receive a error "mkinitrd failed". Without any error > description. I've repeat fresh install of Lenny and OpenSSI and nothing > changed. > > Then I tried to install old Sarge (r7) and OpenSSI v1. My sources.list > file looks like > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian sarge main contrib > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian-volatile/ > sarge/volatile main contrib > security updates commented out > in installation process. > > After installing a minimal system, I tried > # echo "deb http://deb.openssi.org/openssi-v1/ ./" >>> /etc/apt/sources.list > modify apt preferences > # apt-get update > # apt-get dist-upgrade > # apt-get install openssi > > I answered to all of questions and program said that's all good. But > after reboot new kernel not loading. Grub unpacking the kernel image and > freezes. Kernel dead. > I repeat all steps in fresh system, install kernel-patch-2.4-ipvs and > run kernel with this parameters: > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2199.ntpl-ssi-686-smp devfs=mount > root=/dev/hda1 ro > Nothing changed. Kernel looks like dead or infinitely waiting for > somewhat. > > I doubt about this situation. Where is my mistake? Can I install more > new release and where in root deb.openssi.org I can found it? > What OS would be preferable? Maybe I need to move to Fedora Core? > I'm VERY interesting in SSI clustering. I have 5 machines in special 1G > private network. They used independent and this is not comfortable. > > Thanks in advance, > Dmitry. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program > Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users > worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and > speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Ssic-linux-users mailing list > Ssi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users > |
|
From: Roger T. <rog...@gm...> - 2010-08-26 04:02:37
|
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. < gla...@ya...> wrote: > Greetings, > > I was reading the documentation related to NFS for OpenSSI 1.9 > (http://www.openssi.org/cgi-bin/view?page=docs2/1.9/README.nfs-client and > http://www.openssi.org/cgi-bin/view?page=docs2/1.9/README.nfs-server) and > saw > this note: > > *** NOTE: NFS client is not yet supported in the new OpenSSI 2.6 kernel *** > > This is still the reality? > That note was written a long time ago. OpenSSI supports NFS client. We need testing though. > What should I use for OpenSSI 1.9 as a simple shared filesystem? > OpenSSI comes with its own shared filesystem called CFS and is used as the root filesystem by default. -Roger |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. Jr. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-08-26 02:50:08
|
Greetings, I was reading the documentation related to NFS for OpenSSI 1.9 (http://www.openssi.org/cgi-bin/view?page=docs2/1.9/README.nfs-client and http://www.openssi.org/cgi-bin/view?page=docs2/1.9/README.nfs-server) and saw this note: *** NOTE: NFS client is not yet supported in the new OpenSSI 2.6 kernel *** This is still the reality? What should I use for OpenSSI 1.9 as a simple shared filesystem? Thanks, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior -------------------------------------- gla...@ya... --- A well-used door needs no oil on its hinges. A swift-flowing stream does not grow stagnant. Neither sound nor thoughts can travel through a vacuum. Software rots if not used. These are great mysteries -- The Tao Of Programming, 5.1 |
|
From: MatrixS_Master <mat...@ya...> - 2010-08-25 17:59:14
|
Hello all! My name is Dmitry Soloviov and I'm newbie to OpenSSI. And, like a thread starter, got a lot of problems. First I tried install OSSI 1.9.6 on my favorite Lenny in VirtualBox VM. I've done steps 1-17 from this paper: http://deb.openssi.org/openssi/dists/1.9.6-lenny-preview/ On a last step I've receive a error "mkinitrd failed". Without any error description. I've repeat fresh install of Lenny and OpenSSI and nothing changed. Then I tried to install old Sarge (r7) and OpenSSI v1. My sources.list file looks like deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian sarge main contrib deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian-volatile/ sarge/volatile main contrib security updates commented out in installation process. After installing a minimal system, I tried # echo "deb http://deb.openssi.org/openssi-v1/ ./" >> /etc/apt/sources.list modify apt preferences # apt-get update # apt-get dist-upgrade # apt-get install openssi I answered to all of questions and program said that's all good. But after reboot new kernel not loading. Grub unpacking the kernel image and freezes. Kernel dead. I repeat all steps in fresh system, install kernel-patch-2.4-ipvs and run kernel with this parameters: kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1.2199.ntpl-ssi-686-smp devfs=mount root=/dev/hda1 ro Nothing changed. Kernel looks like dead or infinitely waiting for somewhat. I doubt about this situation. Where is my mistake? Can I install more new release and where in root deb.openssi.org I can found it? What OS would be preferable? Maybe I need to move to Fedora Core? I'm VERY interesting in SSI clustering. I have 5 machines in special 1G private network. They used independent and this is not comfortable. Thanks in advance, Dmitry. |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-08-25 16:17:26
|
Mulyadi Santosa escreveu: > Hi.. > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 20:04, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior > <gla...@ya...> wrote: >> I'm not proficient in QEMU. Could you point any good tutorial about it? > > Once I wrote about installing OpenSSI inside Qemu. It's quite old, but > hopefully it provides you initial clue: > http://wiki.openssi.org/go/Installation_of_virtual_openSSI_cluster_on_Qemu > > If you want, you could enhance the document... > Thank you, I'll check this out and if possible provide some update/feedback. Anyway, I still have problems with the setup in my machine and I don't think is something related to hardware. Don't see how using QEMU would help with that. I would provide some updates in the instructions provided at http://openssi.org/cgi-bin/view?page=docs2/1.9/debian/INSTALL.html but I need some guidance (I believe updating the LaTEX source is preferable). Regards, Alceu |
|
From: Mulyadi S. <mul...@gm...> - 2010-08-19 17:34:29
|
Hi.. On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 20:04, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior <gla...@ya...> wrote: > I'm not proficient in QEMU. Could you point any good tutorial about it? Once I wrote about installing OpenSSI inside Qemu. It's quite old, but hopefully it provides you initial clue: http://wiki.openssi.org/go/Installation_of_virtual_openSSI_cluster_on_Qemu If you want, you could enhance the document... -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com |
|
From: Alceu R. de F. J. <gla...@ya...> - 2010-08-19 13:05:10
|
John Hughes escreveu: > The problem is not screwing up hardware, it's being forced to restart > from scratch. If you do your playing in a virtual environment you can > do stuff like: > > 1. install debian sarge on a vm > 2. on the host: cp --sparse=always vm-disk vm-disk-backup > 3. mess up an install of OpenSSI > 4. on the host: cp --sparse=always vm-disk-backup vm-disk > 5. goto 3 You are right. I had to install Debian several times trying to make version 1.9.6 work at least in the init node. I'm not proficient in QEMU. Could you point any good tutorial about it? I tried several times to install 1.9.6 on Sarge, but I just can't install the kernel-image-2.6.11-ssi-686-smp. The error I received is: Setting up kernel-image-2.6.11-ssi-686-smp (1.9.6.-5) ... ldd: /cluster/lib/cfstab: No such file or directory Failed to create initrd image. Then some more errors regarding dependencies of packages related to openssi. I tried to locate cfstab in the packages available by using apt-file, without results. I'm supposing such file or directory will be created dynamically. I followed the setup manual (which has an error regarding the path of OpenSSI deb repositories (should end with a openssi-v1.9.6 instead of v2) and didn't installed any additional packages restrict of what openssi required. Just apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade apt-get install openssi and nothing else. Configuration of apt was executed exactly was it is int the manual (except the URL of DEB repository). I used two DVD images as package repositories and skipped the security updates from Debian during initial setup (getting those updates corrupts the install). My doubt is: what I missing here? Some points: 1 - My hardware is a AMD Sempron LE-1150, so I don't have multiple cores or processors in it. 2 - I executed the default install with Debian Sarge, which means the setup was executed with kernel 2.4.27-3-386 I event tried latter to install the Debian SMP kernel, but got the same error. Should I install Debian with kernel 2.6 and try again? Thank you, Alceu |
|
From: Scott W. <sc...@sl...> - 2010-08-18 22:24:05
|
> /* > * Define the maximum clusternode_t value actually supported, i.e. each > * subsystem must be able to manage/allocate for nodes 1 - > NSC_MAX_NODE_VALUE. > * Should be a runtime value, but that requires more support not yet > * available to a) dynamically size all relevant data structures and b) > * make sure root node's value is passed to joining nodes, and > * supersedes their own. > * When changing this value, please be aware of the limits specified below. > * Setting this smaller saves quite a bit of memory. > */ > Is there a dynamical way to change the max nodes without having to > re-compile the kernel again? Perhaps, but the comment in the chunk of file you included claims otherwise. My money is on the comment. I can't comment on how to successfully edit that file. As for which CPUs you're targeting, that's a Linux config option. Linux has an elaborate configuration system. Read the README that comes with the (in this case, modified) kernel sources. You can edit .config directly, or you can do 'make menuconfig' or 'make xconfig' or various other things. But you still want to read that README. It's straightforward once you learn the basic process. I'm used to the BSD system of kernel config files ;) Cheers, -scott |
|
From: Cumberland, L. <lon...@ni...> - 2010-08-18 18:24:34
|
Hi All,
I found the problem.
It turns out that the problem was in the compile source configs in that I had changed the include/cluster/config.h file to increase the max number of nodes from 15 to 125:
(ORIGINAL) ----------------------------------------
#ifndef _CLUSTER_CONFIG_H
#define _CLUSTER_CONFIG_H
#include <linux/param.h>
#include <linux/threads.h>
/*
* Define the maximum clusternode_t value actually supported, i.e. each
* subsystem must be able to manage/allocate for nodes 1 - NSC_MAX_NODE_VALUE.
* Should be a runtime value, but that requires more support not yet
* available to a) dynamically size all relevant data structures and b)
* make sure root node's value is passed to joining nodes, and
* supersedes their own.
* When changing this value, please be aware of the limits specified below.
* Setting this smaller saves quite a bit of memory.
*/
/* #define NSC_MAX_NODE_VALUE 125 */ /* default */
#define NSC_MAX_NODE_VALUE 15
/*
* Define the part of the pid_t reserved for clusternode_t values.
* Needed regardless of VPROC support in order to generate NSC_NODE_T_RANGE_MAX
*/
#define NODESHIFT 16 /* used by VPROC */
//#define NODESHIFT 23 /* reserve 4 million PIDs per node */
/*
* Derive the maximum valid clusternode_t value, used ONLY for data-type
* range checking
* The PID_MAX defined in threads.h provides a limit to the
* number of nodes that can be operating at one time.
*/
#if defined(VPROC) || defined(CONFIG_CPID)
#define NSC_NODE_T_RANGE_MAX (PID_MAX_LIMIT >> NODESHIFT)
#if NSC_MAX_NODE_VALUE > NSC_NODE_T_RANGE_MAX
#error "NSC_MAX_NODE_VALUE is too large to fit into pid number"
#endif
#endif
#define MAXLOCPID ((1<<NODESHIFT)-1) /* number at which pids recycle */
#define LAST_DAEMON_PID 300 /* RESERVED_PIDS */
#define CLUSTER_IFCONFIG_SZ 64
#define CLUSTER_CLMSINFO_SZ 256
#define CLUSTER_ICSROUTE_SZ 64
#endif /* !_CLUSTER_CONFIG_H */
--------------------------------------------------------
When I made the change, the system just crashed out the nodes while booting and I am not really sure why.
The fix, was to set the values back to the default settings like above.
I will try again to make a smaller adjustment to something like 30 nodes or something to see if that works as I had tried 125 and created the crash on the nodes.
Is there a dynamical way to change the max nodes without having to re-compile the kernel again?
Thanks and have a great day,
Lonnie Cumberland, Prof.
Physicist
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cumberland, Lonnie
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:57 PM
> To: Cumberland, Lonnie; John Hughes; Mulyadi Santosa
> Cc: Openssi users
> Subject: RE: [SSI-users] 2.6.14-smp kernel headers and sources
>
> Hello All,
>
> Well, after testing a number of different things, it turns out that the
> main node seems to be running great and even the fuse module is
> working, but that the other nodes are not coming online. They seem to
> get the kernel, boot the kernel and then crash out.
>
> Thanks and have a great day,
> Lonnie Cumberland, Prof.
> Physicist
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cumberland, Lonnie [mailto:lon...@ni...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 10:18 AM
> > To: John Hughes; Mulyadi Santosa
> > Cc: Openssi users
> > Subject: Re: [SSI-users] 2.6.14-smp kernel headers and sources
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Well, there is good news and bad news.
> >
> > The good news is that the compile went well although I did not know
> how
> > to get the "make" commandline switches to SMP and i686 optizimations.
> >
> > The bad news is that even though the kernel seems to boot ok on the
> > main node, the other nodes do not seems to complete the booting
> > properly and crash out after tftp send over the new kernel which I
> put
> > into place via "ssi-ksync".
> >
> > There was a document on the OpenSSI website that said to do:
> >
> > # make oldconfig (by using the .config that was previously
> > set up)
> > # make dep (the compile reported that this was
> > unnecessary now)
> > # make bzImage (this went fine)
> > # make modules (this went fine)
> > # make modules_install (this went fine)
> >
> > # cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14_ssi (this went
> well)
> >
> > # mkinitrd --cfs /boot/initrd-2.6.14_ssi.img 2.6.14__ssi (PROBLEMS
> > HERE: /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: unrecognized option `--cfs')
> >
> > Instead, I did:
> >
> > # mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd-2.6.14_ssi.img 2.6.14__ssi (since I did
> > this in the install and it went well)
> >
> > But still the other nodes do not seem to come online.
> >
> > Any ideas on how to fix this?
> >
> > Thanks and have a great day,
> > Lonnie Cumberland, Prof.
> > Physicist
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Hughes [mailto:jo...@Ca...]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 7:34 AM
> > > To: Mulyadi Santosa
> > > Cc: Cumberland, Lonnie; Openssi users
> > > Subject: Re: [SSI-users] 2.6.14-smp kernel headers and sources
> > >
> > > Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:42, Cumberland, Lonnie
> > > > <lon...@ni...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I'll look to see what version I have tomorrow morning.
> > > >>
> > > >> Do I have to remove the whole 4.0 version if that is the problem
> > and
> > > install either 3.4 or 3.5 as you mentioned?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Nope, in Fedora/RHEL, this is usually called gcc-compat or
> compat-
> > gcc
> > > > to refer to the "old" gcc. So for example, if Fedora 5 provides
> gcc
> > > > 3.x and 4.x, the 3.x is installed by gcc-compat. Thus, what you
> > need
> > > > to remove the gcc package (but not the compat one).
> > > >
> > > On Debian just install the gcc-3.4 package.
> > >
> > > apt-get install gcc-3.4
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > -------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by
> >
> > Make an app they can't live without
> > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ssic-linux-users mailing list
> > Ssi...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users
|